Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Organic vs. inorganic citizenship

Bibliographic Data

ID4525536
AuthorsBarbara Arneil (0000-0003-0426-1622, University of British Columbia, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume26
Issue4-5
Pages365-371
Publication date2022-07-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCitizenship Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1362-1025 • E-ISSN: 1469-3593
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13621025.2022.2091215
OpenAlexW4283585112
LanguageEN
References cited15

Social contract theories from John Locke to John Rawls are rooted in a flawed ontological foundation as autonomous, self-interested individuals with interests/rights abstracted from any relationship to each other, land/animals they live on/amongst or even time/history live within a state of nature or original position. Political authority and/or fundamental principles of justice are produced as inorganic artifices, constituted via the aggregate consent of natural/pre-political beings. While citizenship may appear universal, in reality, ‘freemen’ were defined along gendered, racialized, class-based, and/or ableist lines. Thus, a hierarchically defined subset of people consents to authority or the principles of justice. In contrast, an organic theory of citizenship is rooted in the opposite ontological premise with human beings understood to be living, growing interdependent beings born into relationships and ecosystems that pre-exist and upon which they depend to live at all, are explicitly anti-hierarchical. Relations between people, society, and the ecosystem must be theorized as a priority rather than bracketed outside of consideration and/or constituted as the byproduct of consent. The central question for an organic theory of citizenship is thus: how to create a healthy ecosystem and non-hierarchical set of relations so humans from birth to old age, creatures, and the earth itself are all able to flourish interdependently

Citizenship · Economic Justice · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Political science · Politics · Premise · Sociology · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Posthumanist Ethics and Activism

  • Political Emotions

    Martha C Nussbaum, Martha Nussbaum•Political Emotions•2013

  • In a Different Voice

    Carol Gilligan•Harvard Educational Review•1977

  • Liberalism and the Limits of Justice

    Open Access•Michael J Sandel•Liberalism and the Limits of…•1998

  • Hegel

    Open Access•G W F Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Fredrich Hegel et al.•Hegel•1991

  • The Personal Is Philosophical Is Political

    Open Access•Eva Feder Kittay•Metaphilosophy•2009

  • The Transit of Empire

    Jodi A Byrd•The transit of empire•2011

  • Multicultural Citizenship

    Will Kymlicka•Multicultural citizenship•1996

  • Integrating Disability, Transforming Feminist Theory

    Rosemarie Garland‐thomson, Rosemarie Garland-Thomson•NWSA Journal•2002

  • Solidarity and social rights

    M Kohn•Critical Review of International…•2017

  • Disability, Self Image, and Modern Political Theory

    Open Access•Barbara Arneil•Political Theory•2009

  • What Is Liberalism

    Open Access•Duncan Bell•Political Theory•2014

  • Grounded Normativity / Place-Based Solidarity

    Open Access•Glen Coulthard, Leanne Betasamosake Simpson•American Quarterly•2016

  • Psychiatric Power

    Open Access•Michel Foucault, A Davidson et al.•Psychiatric Power•2006

  • John Locke Two Treatises of Government

    Open Access•John Locke, Peter Laslett•Locke•1988

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae