Experiencing the progress report
An Analysis of Gender and Administration in Doctoral Candidature
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4545488 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Inger Mewburn (0000-0003-0683-5255, Australian National University), Denise Cuthbert (0000-0003-2959-4546, RMIT University), Ekaterina Tokareva (RMIT University) |
| Año | 2014 |
| Volumen | 36 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 155-171 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2014-03-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1360-080X • E-ISSN: 1469-9508 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1360080x.2013.861054 |
| OpenAlex | W1973788917 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 7 |
| Referencias citadas | 42 |
Most universities around the world put in place administrative processes and systems to manage student progress. These processes usually involve filling out standardised forms and instruments: managerial tools intended to increase transparency, promote efficiency and ensure fairness by applying the same standards to all. The progress report is a widely used management tool in doctoral candidature in Australia and in other countries which look to the United Kingdom for degree structure and format. This reporting mechanism requires students and supervisors to make a retrospective account of the research done in a given period. The intention of the progress report is to provide a mechanism for recording feedback and an opportunity to clarify communication between supervisors, students and the institution itself on the progress of the research. However, whether these managerial tools achieve these aims in doctoral candidature is questionable. In this paper, we report on findings from a study of progress reporting in doctoral studies in one middle-band university in Australia. We found that men and women reported qualitative differences in their encounters with the progress reporting mechanisms, which called into question the idea that these management tools are gender neutral and fair in their effects or application
Academic institution · Administration (probate law · Economics · Higher education · Institution · Management · Medical education · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Transparency (behavior · Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions · Higher Education Practises and Engagement · Medicine · Mentoring and Academic Development
Students’ Perceptions of Doctoral Defense in Relation to Sociodemographic Characteristics
Outside looking in
Gender drag and parody
More than a checkpoint
Understanding the experiences of neurodivergent research students
Writing through the labyrinth
Academic superheroes? A critical analysis of academic job descriptions
Learning From Academia
The Role of the Department and Discipline in Doctoral Student Attrition
A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative Interviews
Grounded Theory Methodology
Women Don't Ask
Gender Disparity in STEM Disciplines
Why So Slow
Gender Trouble
Gender differences in the creation of different types of social capital
Disciplining the Feminist Bodies of Knowledge
Practising Gender at Work
A Serious Researcher or Just Another Nice Girl
The Micro‐politics of Gendering in Networking
Why Do All the Women Disappear?’ Gendering Processes in a Political Science Department
Gender and doctoral studies
Addressing Diversity in the Decade of Behavior
Of heads and hearts
The Department Is Very Male, Very White, Very Old, and Very Conservative
Research cultures in English and Scottish university education departments
Leaving the Ivory Tower
Influence of Role Models and Mentors on Female Graduate Students’ Choice of Science as a Career
Audit Cultures
Fitting the Mold of Graduate School
How shall we know them? Capturing the diversity of difference in Australian doctoral candidates and their experiences
Bodies in narratives of doctoral students' learning and experience
The PhD and the Autonomous Self
Lone scholar or community member? The role of student networks in doctoral education in a UK management school
Un/masking Identity
| Obras citantes distintas | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,64 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2015 - 2025 (11) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 7 |