Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

After Hamlet

Two Perspectives

Bibliographic Data

ID4550668
AuthorsMichal Kobialka (0000-0002-6698-4140, corresponding author)
Year1986
Volume38
Issue2
Pages196
Publication date1986-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheatre Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0192-2882 • E-ISSN: 1086-332X
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3208119
OpenAlexW2327235134
LanguageEN

Shakespeare's plays have a long tradition of being altered and adapted to suit different cultural tastes. This tendency to regularize the texts began at least as early as the Restoration; e.g., Dryden's All for Love (1677), an attempt to improve Antony and Cleopatra, and Tate's happy ending in King Lear (1681). A tradition of alteration and imitation initially established in England has spread to other countries. Hamlet serves as a good example: it was common practice in nineteenth-century productions of the play to omit Fortinbras. Moreover, most Shakespearean burlesques of the same century did not include this character.' Fortinbras seemed unnecessary and unwanted due to the scanty treatment afforded him in the original play.2 Rather than trying to

Art · HAMLET (protein complex · Literature · Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae