Dates in History
Chronology and Memory1
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4557561 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Diana E Greenway (University of London), Diana Greenway (University of London, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 178 |
| Pages | 127-139 |
| Publication date | 1999-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Historical Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0950-3471 • E-ISSN: 1468-2281 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1468-2281.00077 |
| OpenAlex | W2103449197 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
The modern method of dating events by reference to an independent time-line came into use slowly, recently and partially. The predominant chronological device in the ancient and medieval worlds was dating by the year of an office, such as a king's reign. The Roman and medieval calendars had much in common, including the annual commemorations of religious, civil and family events. The Jewish idea of jubilee lies behind the growth of centennial and similar celebrations. Personal memory has difficulty with intervals of time and the sequence of happenings, and even today individuals often resort to the ancient dating mechanisms of relative chronology, centred on persons and offices
Ancient history · Archaeology · Centennial · Chronology · Genealogy · Reign · Byzantine Studies and History · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · Eurasian Exchange Networks · History · Law
| Citations per year | 0.21 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2012 - 2024 (13) |
| Highly cited | No |