Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Using Guttman errors to explore rater fit in rater-mediated performance assessments

Bibliographic Data

ID4563701
AuthorsStefanie A Wind (0000-0002-1599-375X, University of Alabama, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume11
Issue3
Pages205979911881439
Publication date2018-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMethodological Innovations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2059-7991 • E-ISSN: 2059-7991
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/2059799118814396
OpenAlexW2902150877
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited29

Model-data fit indices for raters provide insight into the degree to which raters demonstrate psychometric properties defined as useful within a measurement framework. Fit statistics for raters are particularly relevant within frameworks based on invariant measurement, such as Rasch measurement theory and Mokken scale analysis. A simple approach to examining invariance is to examine assessment data for evidence of Guttman errors. I used real and simulated data to illustrate and explore a nonparametric procedure for evaluating rater errors based on Guttman errors and to examine the alignment between Guttman errors and other indices of rater fit. The results suggested that researchers and practitioners can use summaries of Guttman errors to identify raters who exhibit misfit. Furthermore, results from the comparisons between summaries of Guttman errors and parametric fit statistics suggested that both approaches detect similar problematic measurement characteristics. Specifically, raters who exhibit many Guttman errors tended to have higher-than-expected Outfit MSE statistics and lower-than-expected estimated slope statistics. I discuss implications of these results as they relate to research and practice for rater-mediated assessments

Econometrics · Guttman scale · Item response theory · Level of measurement · Parametric statistics · Psychometrics · Rasch model · Rating scale · Statistics · Computer Science · Mathematics · Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Psychology · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

  • A nonparametric procedure for exploring differences in rating quality across test-taker subgroups in rater-mediated writing assessments

    Open Access•Stefanie A Wind•Language Testing•2019

  • Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory

    Klaas Sijtsma, Ivo Molenaar et al.•Introduction to Nonparametric…•2002

  • A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis

    Robert J Mokken•Theory and Procedure of Scale…•1971

  • Applying the Rasch Model

    Christine M Fox, Trevor G Bond et al.•Applying the Rasch Model•2015

  • Cognitive Assessment Models with Few Assumptions, and Connections with Nonparametric Item Response Theory

    Open Access•Brian W Junker, Klaas Sijtsma•Applied Psychological Measurement•2001

  • Using the Many-Faceted Rasch Model to Evaluate Standard Setting Judgments

    Open Access•Pamela K Kaliski, Pamela Kaliski et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2013

  • Adjacent-Categories Mokken Models for Rater-Mediated Assessments

    Open Access•Stefanie A Wind•Educational and Psychological…•2017

  • A systematic review of methods for evaluating rating quality in language assessment

    Open Access•Stefanie A Wind, Meghan E Peterson•Language Testing•2018

  • Cross-National Measure of Fear-Based Xenophobia

    Open Access•Kees Van Der Veer, Oksana Yakushko et al.•Psychological Reports•2011

  • A rating formulation for ordered response categories

    Open Access•David Andrich•Psychometrika•1978

  • Standard Errors and Confidence Intervals for Scalability Coefficients in Mokken Scale Analysis Using Marginal Models

    Open Access•Renske E Kuijpers, L Andries Van Der Ark et al.•Sociological Methodology•2013

  • Examining the Internal Structure Evidence for the Performance Assessment for California Teachers

    Open Access•Brent Duckor, Katherine E Castellano et al.•Journal of Teacher Education•2014

  • Weighted kappa

    Jacob Cohen•Psychological Bulletin•1968

  • Using Mokken methods to develop robust cross-national scales

    Open Access•Michael Gillespie, Elisabeth M Tenvergert et al.•Social Indicators Research•1988

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,14
Citation span2019 - 2019 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae