Choice and prohibition in non-monotonic contexts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4569018 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicole Gotzner (0000-0002-9584-4518, Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics, corresponding author), Jacopo Romoli (0000-0003-2165-4559, University of Ulster), Paolo Santorio (0000-0001-6840-7630, University of Maryland, College Park) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 141-174 |
| Publication date | 2020-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Natural Language Semantics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0925-854X • E-ISSN: 1572-865X |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11050-019-09160-9 |
| OpenAlex | W2984054378 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 31 |
Disjunctions in the scope of possibility modals give rise to a conjunctive inference, generally referred to as 'free choice.' For example,Emma can take Spanish or Calculussuggests that Emma can take Spanish and can take Calculus. This inference is not valid on standard semantics for modals in combination with a Boolean semantics for disjunction. Hence free choice has sparked a whole industry of theories in philosophy of language and semantics. This paper investigates free choice in sentences involving a non-monotonic modified numeral, under which we embed a possibility modal scoping over disjunction. One example isExactly one student can(not) take Spanish or Calculus. As we point out, the presence (or absence) of certain readings of these sentences is a key test for a prominent approach, which analyzes free choice as a kind of scalar implicature. We report on two experiments investigating the readings of such sentences, using an inferential task. Our results are challenging for the implicature approach. We sketch two possible solutions within this approach, either adopting a different recent implicature algorithm, or exploring a different meaning for modified numerals withexactly. Both of them suffer from a variety of problems. We then discuss a third solution, which exploits a recent account of free choice based on homogeneity. This approach can account for our results, in combination with plausible assumptions about homogeneity projection, though it too has open issues with related cases. Regardless of which solution is chosen, non-monotonic contexts turn out to be an important test case for theories of free choice, implicature, and modified numerals
Implicature · Inference · Linguistics · Mathematical economics · Modal verb · Monotonic function · Pragmatics · Programming language · Verb · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Computer Science · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Mathematics · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence
Logic in Grammar
Scalar Implicatures, Polarity Phenomena, and the Syntax/Pragmatics Interface
Free Choice and the Theory of Scalar Implicatures
Experimental Evidence for Embedded Scalar Implicatures
The Scalar Inferences of Strong Scalar Terms under Negative Quantifiers and Constraints on the Theory of Alternatives
Interpreting plural predication
Presupposed free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures
Quantity implicatures, exhaustive interpretation, and rational conversation
Filtering free choice
Free choice and homogeneity
Probability and implicatures
Temporal anaphora across and inside sentences
Cancelling the Maxim of Quantity
Universal Implicatures and Free Choice Effects
Global positive polarity items and obligatory exhaustivity
Children's Knowledge of Free Choice Inferences and Scalar Implicatures
A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind mandatory scalar implicatures
Two methods to find truth-value gaps and their application to the projection problem of homogeneity
Economy and embedded exhaustification
The symmetry problem
Scalar implicatures of embedded disjunction
Free Choice Disjunction and Epistemic Possibility
Structurally-defined alternatives
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |