Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Dependent plural pronouns with Skolemized choice functions

Bibliographic Data

ID4569043
AuthorsYasutada Sudo (0000-0003-0248-9308, University College London, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume22
Issue3
Pages265-297
Publication date2014-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNatural Language Semantics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0925-854X • E-ISSN: 1572-865X
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11050-014-9107-3
OpenAlexW2050179229
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited32

The present paper discusses two interesting phenomena concerning phi-features on plural pronouns: (i) plural pronouns that denote atomic individuals (‘dependent plural pronouns’), and (ii) plural pronouns with more than one binder (‘partial binding’). A novel account of these two phenomena is proposed, according to which all occurrences of phi-features are both semantically and morphologically relevant. For such a ‘uniformly semantic account’ of phi-features, dependent plural pronouns constitute a theoretical challenge, while partial binding is more or less straightforwardly accounted for. In order to make sense of the semantic effects of the phi-features on dependent plural pronouns, the following idea is pursued: the phi-features on a dependent plural pronoun reflect the range of values that the pronoun takes, rather than the particular value it denotes at a time. This idea is implemented in a compositional semantics by making use of (Skolemized) choice functions. An appealing feature of the present account is that, unlike its predecessors, it accounts for dependent plural pronouns without c-commanding antecedents in essentially the same way as for those with c-commanding antecedents. It is also shown how this account of dependent plural pronouns can straightforwardly be augmented with set indices to account for partial binding

Linguistics · Natural language processing · Personal pronoun · Plural · Pronoun · Reflexive pronoun · Syntax · Computer Science · Mathematics · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Psychology · semigroups and automata theory · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • A Two-Tiered Theory of Control

    Idan Landau, Samuel Jay Keyser•Two-Tiered Theory of Control•2015

  • Bound Variable Anaphora

    Open Access•Rose‐marie Déchaine, Martina Wiltschko•The Wiley Blackwell Companion to…•2017

  • Hybrid agreement with English quantifier partitives

    Open Access•Troy Messick•Glossa a journal of general…•2023

  • Gender and interpretation in Greek

    Open Access•Yasutada Sudo, Giorgos Spathas•Glossa a journal of general…•2020

  • Processing bound-variable singular they

    Open Access•Chung-Hye Han, Chung–hye Han et al.•The Canadian Journal of…•2022

  • Definite description of episodic free relatives in Jordanian Arabic

    Open Access•Abdel‐Rahman Abu Helal, Abdel-Rahman Abu Helal•Lingua•2021

  • Agreement at PF

    Open Access•Idan Landau•Syntax•2016

  • Reference and generality

    P T Geach•Reference and generality•1968

  • Binding Theory

    Open Access•Daneel Buring, Daniel Büring•Binding Theory•2005

  • Pluralities

    Open Access•Roger Schwarzschild•Pluralities•1996

  • E-Type pronouns and donkey anaphora

    Open Access•Irene Heim•Linguistics and Philosophy•1990

  • Groups, I

    Open Access•Fred Landman•Linguistics and Philosophy•1989

  • Scope or Pseudoscope? Are there Wide-Scope Indefinites?

    Angelika Kratzer•Events and Grammar•1998

  • Choice Functions and the Scopal Semantics of Indefinites

    Open Access•Yoad Winter•Linguistics and Philosophy•1997

  • Quantifier Scope

    Open Access•Tanya Reinhart•Linguistics and Philosophy•1997

  • More Structural Analogies Between Pronouns and Tenses

    Open Access•Angelika Kratzer•Proceedings from Semantics and…•1998

  • Direct Compositionality and 'Uninterpretability'

    Pauline Jacobson•Journal of Semantics•2012

  • Scopal Independence

    Philippe Schlenker•Journal of Semantics•2006

  • The semantics and pragmatics of plurals

    Open Access•Donka F Farkas, Donka Farkas et al.•Semantics and Pragmatics•2010

  • Embedded implicatures observed

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Chad Dube•Semantics and Pragmatics•2010

  • Flexibility Principles in Boolean Semantics

    Open Access•Yoad Winter•Computational Linguistics•2002

  • Semantics in Generative Grammar

    Brogan Geurts, Bart Geurts et al.•Language•1999

  • Reference and Generality

    Open Access•T J Smiley•Philosophical Books•1963

  • Making a Pronoun

    Angelika Kratzer•Linguistic Inquiry•2009

  • First and Second Person Pronouns as Bound Variables

    Hotze Rullman•Linguistic Inquiry•2004

  • Presupposing acquaintance

    Open Access•Emar Maier•Linguistics and Philosophy•2009

  • Atoms and Sets

    Yoad Winter•Linguistic Inquiry•2002

  • Plurals, presuppositions and the sources of distributivity

    Open Access•Roger Schwarzschild•Natural Language Semantics•1993

  • Questions with quantifiers

    Open Access•Gennaro Chierchia•Natural Language Semantics•1992

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,64
Citation span2015 - 2023 (9)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae