Dependent plural pronouns with Skolemized choice functions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4569043 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yasutada Sudo (0000-0003-0248-9308, University College London, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 265-297 |
| Publication date | 2014-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Natural Language Semantics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0925-854X • E-ISSN: 1572-865X |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11050-014-9107-3 |
| OpenAlex | W2050179229 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 32 |
The present paper discusses two interesting phenomena concerning phi-features on plural pronouns: (i) plural pronouns that denote atomic individuals (‘dependent plural pronouns’), and (ii) plural pronouns with more than one binder (‘partial binding’). A novel account of these two phenomena is proposed, according to which all occurrences of phi-features are both semantically and morphologically relevant. For such a ‘uniformly semantic account’ of phi-features, dependent plural pronouns constitute a theoretical challenge, while partial binding is more or less straightforwardly accounted for. In order to make sense of the semantic effects of the phi-features on dependent plural pronouns, the following idea is pursued: the phi-features on a dependent plural pronoun reflect the range of values that the pronoun takes, rather than the particular value it denotes at a time. This idea is implemented in a compositional semantics by making use of (Skolemized) choice functions. An appealing feature of the present account is that, unlike its predecessors, it accounts for dependent plural pronouns without c-commanding antecedents in essentially the same way as for those with c-commanding antecedents. It is also shown how this account of dependent plural pronouns can straightforwardly be augmented with set indices to account for partial binding
Linguistics · Natural language processing · Personal pronoun · Plural · Pronoun · Reflexive pronoun · Syntax · Computer Science · Mathematics · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Psychology · semigroups and automata theory · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Reference and generality
Binding Theory
Pluralities
E-Type pronouns and donkey anaphora
Groups, I
Scope or Pseudoscope? Are there Wide-Scope Indefinites?
Choice Functions and the Scopal Semantics of Indefinites
Quantifier Scope
More Structural Analogies Between Pronouns and Tenses
Direct Compositionality and 'Uninterpretability'
Scopal Independence
The semantics and pragmatics of plurals
Embedded implicatures observed
Flexibility Principles in Boolean Semantics
Semantics in Generative Grammar
Reference and Generality
Making a Pronoun
First and Second Person Pronouns as Bound Variables
Presupposing acquaintance
Atoms and Sets
Plurals, presuppositions and the sources of distributivity
Questions with quantifiers
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,64 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2023 (9) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |