Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Your "Voornaam" is not my "Voornaam

An acoustic analysis of individual talker differences in word stress in Dutch

Bibliographic Data

ID4579285
AuthorsGiulio G A Severijnen (0000-0003-1322-9202, Radboud University Nijmegen, corresponding author), Hans Rutger Bosker (0000-0002-2628-7738, Radboud University Nijmegen), James M Mcqueen (0000-0003-3734-6286, Radboud University Nijmegen)
Year2024
Volume103
Pages101296
Publication date2024-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Phonetics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0095-4470 • E-ISSN: 1095-8576
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101296
OpenAlexW4391504567
LanguageNL
Citations received6
References cited49

Different talkers speak differently, even within the same homogeneous group. These differences lead to acoustic variability in speech, causing challenges for correct perception of the intended message. Because previous descriptions of this acoustic variability have focused mostly on segments, talker variability in prosodic structures is not yet well documented. The present study therefore examined acoustic between-talker variability in word stress in Dutch. We recorded 40 native Dutch talkers from a participant sample with minimal dialectal variation and balanced gender, producing segmentally overlapping words (e.g., VOORnaam vs. voorNAAM; ‘first name’ vs. ‘respectable’, capitalization indicates lexical stress), and measured different acoustic cues to stress. Each individual participant’s acoustic measurements were analyzed using Linear Discriminant Analyses, which provided coefficients for each cue, reflecting the strength of each cue in a talker’s productions. On average, talkers primarily used mean F0, intensity, and duration. Moreover, each participant also employed a unique combination of cues, illustrating large prosodic variability between talkers. In fact, classes of cue-weighting tendencies emerged, differing in which cue was used as the main cue. These results offer the most comprehensive acoustic description, to date, of word stress in Dutch, and illustrate that large prosodic variability is present between individual talkers

Linguistics · Speech recognition · Stress (linguistics) · Word (group theory) · Computer Science · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Philosophy · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology · Speech Recognition and Synthesis

  • Foreign Language Learners Show a Kinematic Accent in Their Co-Speech Hand Movements

    Open Access•Hans Rutger Bosker, Marieke Hoetjes et al.•Open MIND•2026

  • Strong primary cue weighting is linked to robust dimension-selective attention

    Open Access•Ashley E Symons, Ashley Symons et al.•Cognition•2026

  • Three worlds of variables to control in linguistics

    Chunlei Yang•Theoretical Linguistics•2024

  • Audiovisual Perception of Lexical Stress

    Open Access•Ronny Bujok, Andrea S Meyer et al.•Language and Speech•2024

  • Relative importance of stress correlates in native listeners' identification of Spanish lexical stress produced by monolingual and bilingual speakers

    Open Access•Ji Young Kim•Journal of Phonetics•2025

  • Prosody in Pragmatic Competence

    Open Access•Mo Chen, Shuai Li et al.•Language Learning•2025

  • An integrated theory of language production and comprehension

    Open Access•Martin J Pickering, Simon Garrod•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2013

  • Robust speech perception

    Open Access•Dave F Kleinschmidt, Dave Kleinschmidt et al.•Psychological Review•2015

  • Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British

    Jonathan Harrington, Felicitas Kleber et al.•The Journal of the Acoustical…•2008

  • Spectrographic Study of Vowel Reduction

    Björn Lindblom•The Journal of the Acoustical…•1963

  • Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress

    Agaath M C Sluijter, Vincent J Van Heuven•The Journal of the Acoustical…•1996

  • Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels

    James Hillenbrand, Laura Arlene Getty et al.•The Journal of the Acoustical…•1995

  • The motor theory of speech perception revised

    Open Access•Alvin M Liberman, Ignatius G Mattingly•Cognition•1985

  • LmerTest Package

    Open Access•Alexandra Kuznetsova, Per B Brockhoff et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2017

  • Encoding and decoding of meaning through structured variability in intonational speech prosody

    Open Access•Xin Xie, Andrés Buxó-Lugo et al.•Cognition•2021

  • Methodological issues in the study of word stress correlates

    Timo B Roettger, Timo Roettger et al.•Linguistics Vanguard•2017

  • Constraints of Lexical Stress on Lexical Access in English

    Open Access•Nicole Cooper, Antony Cutler et al.•Language and Speech•2002

  • Voornaam is not (really) a Homophone

    Open Access•Antony Cutler, Wilma van Donselaar•Language and Speech•2001

  • Linking Variation in Perception and Production in Sound Change

    Open Access•Anne-France Pinget, René Kager et al.•Language and Speech•2020

  • Forbear is a Homophone

    Open Access•Antony Cutler•Language and Speech•1986

  • Voicing” in English

    Open Access•Leigh Lisker•Language and Speech•1986

  • Evidence For Selective Adaptation and Recalibration in the Perception of Lexical Stress

    Open Access•Hans Rutger Bosker•Language and Speech•2022

  • The Relationship between the Perception and Production of Coarticulation during a Sound Change in Progress

    Open Access•Felicitas Kleber, Jonathan Harrington et al.•Language and Speech•2012

  • Native, non-native and L2 perceptual cue weighting for Dutch vowels

    Open Access•Paola Escudero, Titia Benders et al.•Journal of Phonetics•2009

  • Acoustic correlates of word stress

    Matthew Gordon, Timo B Roettger•Linguistics Vanguard•2017

  • Acoustic correlates of primary and secondary stress in North American English

    Open Access•Ingo Plag, Gero Kunter et al.•Journal of Phonetics•2011

  • Acoustical and perceptual analysis of the voicing distinction in Dutch initial plosives

    Open Access•Petra M Van Alphen, Roel Smits•Journal of Phonetics•2004

  • Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast

    Open Access•Jessamyn Schertz, Taehong Cho et al.•Journal of Phonetics•2015

  • Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American English

    Open Access•Cynthia G Clopper, Rajka Smiljanic•Journal of Phonetics•2011

  • Prosodic influences on consonant production in Dutch

    Open Access•Taehong Cho, James M Mcqueen•Journal of Phonetics•2005

  • A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops

    Leigh Lisker, Arthur S Abramson•WORD•1964

Unique citing works6
Citations per year3
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae