Open and opaque? The performativity of open priorities in a Norwegian hospital

Being open about priority-setting decisions is a central element of frameworks enhancing procedural fairness. While challenges in implementing priority-setting frameworks in general have been reported, few studies have empirically examined how the concept of openness is understood and enacted in the day-to-day functioning of hospitals. This paper explores the operationalisation of the policy of "open priorities", based on long-term ethnographic fieldwork in a Norwegian hospital in 2022. Drawing on the concept of performativity, the study portrays how the ideal of open priorities translates into everyday practices related to why, for whom and which priorities are to be open. The paper shows how openness was portrayed as a central hospital policy, but was also seen as a source of conflicts, hindering effective governance and reducing public trust. Hence, hospital leaders transformed and diluted the ideal of openness into priority-setting decisions with multiple shields of opaqueness. Through omissions and rewritings of the notion of openness, health leaders enacted performativity. The paper adds to the growing body of knowledge of the multifaceted ways policy ideals are transformed by government institutions in the process of implementation and calls for further exploration of efforts to improve everyday and routinised procedural fairness

Media studies · Norwegian · Opacity · Optics · Performativity · Physics · Sociology · Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research · Gender Studies · Management and Organizational Studies · Medicine · Philosophy · Optometry

• Discretionary Compromises

  Open Access•I L Teig, Elisabeth Andvik•Sociology of Health & Illness•2026

  Incluir item

• Negotiating clinical practice guidelines

  Open Access•Audun Brendbekken, Ole F Norheim et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2025

  Incluir item

• Biases distorting priority setting

  Open Access•Bjørn Hofmann•Health Policy•2020

  Incluir item

• Applying priority-setting frameworks

  Open Access•S Donya Razavi, Donya Razavi et al.•Health Policy•2020

  Incluir item

• Bodies that Matter

  Merl Storr, Society for Women in Philosophy UK•Women’s Philosophy Review•1994

  Incluir item

• Criteria for the procedural fairness of health financing decisions

  Open Access•E Dale, Elizabeth F Peacocke et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2023

  Incluir item

• Barriers and facilitators to implementing priority setting and resource allocation tools in hospital decisions

  Open Access•Antonio Ahumada-Canale, Varinder Jeet et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2023

  Incluir item

• Making Hospitals Governable

  Open Access•Iris Wallenburg, Julia Quartz et al.•Administration & Society•2019

  Incluir item

• A politics of priority setting

  Open Access•Neale Smith, Craig Mitton et al.•Public Policy and Administration•2014

  Incluir item

• Policy, paperwork and 'postographs

  Open Access•Arne Melberg, Abdoulaye Hama Diallo et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2018

  Incluir item

• Procedural justice and the individual participant in priority setting

  Open Access•Siun Gallagher, Miles Little•Social Science & Medicine•2019

  Incluir item

• Priority setting in hospitals

  Open Access•Jennifer Gibson, Jennifer L Gibson et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2005

  Incluir item

• Political strategies in difficult times - The "backstage" experience of Swedish politicians on formal priority setting in healthcare

  Open Access•Peter Garpenby, Ann-Charlotte Nedlund•Social Science & Medicine•2016

  Incluir item

• Enacting corporate governance of healthcare safety and quality

  Open Access•Tim Freeman, Ross Millar et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2016

  Incluir item

• Global Health Business

  Open Access•Susan L Erikson•Medical Anthropology•2012

  Incluir item