Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Stock options, tax credits or employment contracts please! The value of deliberative public disagreement about human tissue donation

Bibliographic Data

ID4593510
AuthorsHeather L Walmsley, Heather Walmsley (0000-0002-8821-5035, Concordia University, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume73
Issue2
Pages209-216
Publication date2011-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science & Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.005
PMID21683492
OpenAlexW1997242172
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited31

Corporate governance · Deliberation · Deliberative democracy · Democracy · Economics · Law and economics · Management · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Community Development and Social Impact · Ethics in Clinical Research · Law · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Public Administration

  • Public Deliberation in Health Policy and Bioethics

    Open Access•Julia Abelson, Erika Blacksher et al.•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2013

  • The reported impact of public involvement in biobanks

    Open Access•Lidia Luna Puerta, Will Kendall et al.•Health Expectations•2020

  • Which public and why deliberate? – A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research

    Open Access•Chris Degeling, Stacy M Carter et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2015

  • Deliberative public opinion

    Open Access•Kieran C O''Doherty•History of the Human Sciences•2017

  • Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research

    Open Access•Kieran C O''Doherty, Alice K Hawkins et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2012

  • The unbearable lightness of citizens within public deliberation processes

    Open Access•P Lehoux, Geneviève Daudelin et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2012

  • Why Deliberative Democracy?

    Amy Gutmann, D F Thompson et al.•Why Deliberative Democracy?•2004

  • Mad scientists bend the frame of biobank governance in British Columbia

    Open Access•Heather L Walmsley, Heather Walmsley•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2009

  • Biobanking, public consultation, and the discursive logics of deliberation

    Open Access•Heather Walmsley•Public Understanding of Science•2010

  • Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes

    Robert M Emerson, Rachel I Fretz et al.•Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes•1995

  • Ethnography

    M Hammersley, Paul Atkinson•Ethnography•2019

  • Anthropology and the Dialectic of Enlightenment

    Open Access•B Kapferer•The Australian Journal of…•2007

  • Materialising Oceania

    Open Access•Joshua A Bell, H Geismar•The Australian Journal of…•2009

  • Keeping Ethnography Alive in an Urbanizing World

    Roger Sanjek•Human Organization•2000

  • Public Participation in Science and Technology

    Brian Wynne•East Asian Science Technology and…•2007

  • Populism, Localism and Environmental Politics

    Open Access•Steven Grigg, Steven Griggs et al.•Planning Theory•2008

  • Ethos, Agonism and Populism

    Open Access•David Howarth, David R Howarth•The British Journal of Politics…•2007

  • Shifting Subject Positions

    Open Access•Anne Kerr, Sarah Cunningham-Burley et al.•Social Studies of Science•2007

  • Subject Positioning and Deliberative Democracy

    Open Access•Kieran C O''Doherty, Kieran C O'Doherty et al.•Journal for the Theory of Social…•2010

  • Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism

    Open Access•James Bohman•Political Theory•1995

  • Agreement and Disagreement in Group Deliberation

    Jennifer Stromer-Galley, Jennifer Stromer‐galley et al.•Political Communication•2009

  • Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion

    Vincent Price, Joseph N Cappella et al.•Political Communication•2002

  • Ideology, Attitude Change, and Deliberation in Small Face-to-Face Groups

    John Gastil, Laura W Black et al.•Political Communication•2008

  • Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals

    Open Access•John S Dryzek, Shirley Niemeyer et al.•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • The myth of the best argument

    Open Access•Luigi Pellizzoni•British Journal of Sociology•2001

  • Informed consent in biobank research

    Open Access•David M Secko, David Secko et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2009

  • Deliberation in the Wilderness

    Shirley Niemeyer, Simon Niemeyer•Environmental Politics•2004

  • Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research

    Open Access•Kieran C O''Doherty, Alice K Hawkins et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2012

  • The unbearable lightness of citizens within public deliberation processes

    Open Access•P Lehoux, Geneviève Daudelin et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2012

  • Power Relations

    Open Access•Jason Chilvers, Jacquelin Burge et al.•Environment and Planning A…•2008

  • Between Facts and Norms

    Jürgen Habermas•Between Facts and Norms•1996

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,43
Citation span2012 - 2020 (9)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae