Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

International and temporal comparative analysis of UK and US drug safety regulation in changing political contexts

Bibliographic Data

ID4595192
AuthorsJohn Abraham (0000-0003-3643-0128, King's College London, corresponding author), Julian Abraham (0000-0003-0643-0274), Courtney Davis (0000-0002-9425-9886, King's College London)
Year2020
Volume255
Pages113005
Publication date2020-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science & Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113005
PMID32361122
OpenAlexW3017400791
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited22

Modern UK drug regulation began in 1971. In view of significant neo-liberal political reforms to drug regulation in the UK and US since the early 1990s, this article compares the performance of UK and US drug safety regulation during both 1971-1992 and 1993-2004, by investigating drug safety withdrawals (DSWs). Combined quantitative and comprehensive qualitative regulatory case history methodology is employed to explain comparative trends in DSWs and relate them to the key claims of central regulatory theories. It is found that there was a dramatic increase in DSWs in the US during 1993-2004 compared with 1971-1992, and a major increase in the extent to which drugs withdrawn on safety grounds in the UK were left on the US market. Analysis reveals that these findings are best explained by changes in institutional regulatory culture at FDA, consequent upon neo-liberal reforms during 1993-2004, which meant that US regulators adopted more permissive interpretations of safety signals and associated risk-benefit assessments leading to more unsafe drugs being approved on to the US market than during 1971-1992. Changes in the UK are less marked because it already embraced a relatively permissive regulatory culture during 1971-1992 and neo-liberal reforms post-1992 were more attenuated. It is concluded that the changes support corporate bias theory, and that, to improve patient protection, drug safety regulation in the UK and US should shift direction towards the US regulatory model of 1971-92

Economics · Permissive · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Regulatory reform · Law · Medicine · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions · Public Administration

  • Mechanisms of regulatory capture

    Open Access•Eva Heim, Sophie Moxon•Regulation & Governance•2024

  • Governing Agricultural Biotechnologies in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany

    Open Access•Adrian Ely, Beate Friedrich et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2023

  • The Political Sociology of Nice

    Open Access•Julian Abraham, Gowree Balendran•Sociology of Health & Illness•2025

  • The challenge of institutionalised complicity

    Open Access•Paul Martins•Sociology of Health & Illness•2022

  • Divergent spender

    Open Access•Ben Main, Piotr Ozieranski•Sociology of Health & Illness•2021

  • Reputation and Power

    Daniel Carpenter•Reputation and Power•2014

  • Preventing Regulatory Capture

    Open Access•Daniel Carpenter, David A Moss•Preventing Regulatory Capture•2013

  • Trading risks for markets

    John Abraham, Julian Abraham et al.•Health Risk & Society•2001

  • Transnational pharmacogovernance

    Open Access•Mary Wiktorowicz, K Moscou et al.•Globalization and Health•2018

  • Science, politics and the pharmaceutical industry

    Open Access•Paul Vallance, Patrick Vallance•Social Science & Medicine•1996

  • A comparative analysis of drug safety withdrawals in the UK and the US (1971-1992)

    Open Access•John Abraham, Julian Abraham et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2005

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1
Citation span2021 - 2025 (5)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae