I don't see gender
Conceptualizing a gendered system of academic publishing
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4597215 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jamie Lundine (0000-0002-2463-795X, University of Ottawa), Ivy Lynn Bourgeault (0000-0002-5113-9243, University of Ottawa), Ketevan Glonti (0000-0001-9991-7991, Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique), Eleanor Hutchinson (0000-0002-9718-2407, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Dina Balabanova (0000-0001-7163-3428, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 235 |
| Páginas | 112388 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Social Science & Medicine (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347 |
| Editora | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112388 |
| PMID | 31288167 |
| OpenAlex | W2954430020 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 9 |
| Referências citadas | 58 |
Academic experts share their ideas, as well as contribute to advancing health science by participating in publishing as an author, reviewer and editor. The academy shapes and is shaped by knowledge produced within it. As such, the production of scientific knowledge can be described as part of a socially constructed system. Like all socially constructed systems, scientific knowledge production is influenced by gender. This study investigated one layer of this system through an analysis of journal editors' understanding of if and how gender influences editorial practices in peer reviewed health science journals. The study involved two stages: 1) exploratory in-depth qualitative interviews with editors at health science journals; and 2) a nominal group technique (NGT) with experts working on gender in research, academia and the journal peer review process. Our findings indicate that some editors had not considered the impact of gender on their editorial work. Many described how they actively strive to be 'gender blind,' as this was seen as a means to be objective. This view fails to recognize how broader social structures operate to produce systemic inequities. None of the editors or publishers in this study were collecting gender or other social indicators as part of the article submission process. These findings suggest that there is room for editors and publishers to play a more active role in addressing structural inequities in academic publishing to ensure a diversity of knowledge and ideas are reflected
Political science · Publishing · Sociology · Diversity and Career in Medicine · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Studies · Law · Mentoring and Academic Development
The White Man Question
Who Counts? Gender, Gatekeeping, and Quantitative Human Geography
Gender and residential water use in Los Angeles
Decolonising Terrorism Journals
Business as usual? Taking stock of submissions and reviews two years after the first coronavirus lockdowns
Publishing Trends by Gender and Career Stage, 1994–2022
The challenges in integrating horizontal perspectives in sectoral policy evaluation
Envisioning a More Inclusive Future for Digital Journalism
Child Welfare Abolition
Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands
Sex and Gender Equity in Research
Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals
Bias in peer review
The Bias Blind Spot
Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact
Peer Review
Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?
Sexism As A Means Of Reproduction
Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology
Purposive Sampling as a Tool for Informant Selection
On being included
Journal peer review in context
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Mapping the Margins
The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations
Blindness as Metaphor
One and a half million medical papers reveal a link between author gender and attention to gender and sex analysis
Science in Action
Situated Knowledges
Men Set Their Own Cites High
Unpacking the Gender System
Moored Metamorphoses
Intersectionality Undone
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,8 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 9 |