Does "process utility" exist? A case study of willingness to pay for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4598092 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cam Donaldson (0000-0003-4670-5340), Phil Shackley (0000-0002-1862-0596, University of Sheffield) |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 699-707 |
| Publication date | 1997-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Science & Medicine (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00215-8 |
| PMID | 9032837 |
| OpenAlex | W1976976699 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 8 |
Actuarial science · Cholecystectomy · Economics · Health care · Laparoscopic cholecystectomy · Outcome (game theory · Process (computing · Test (biology · Willingness to pay · Computer Science · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Policy and Management · Medicine · Surgery
Using willingness to pay to investigate regressiveness of user fees in health facilities in Tanzania
A cost-based equity weight for use in the economic evaluation of primary health care interventions
Initial development of the Temporary Utilities Index
Valuing the Benefit for Cancer Patients of Receiving Blood Transfusions at Home
Harsanyi, Sen ou Bentham
Value for Money
The impact of information on non-health attributes on willingness to pay for multiple health care programmes
Trading-off outcomes and policy characteristics of a Universal Basic Income and a Minimum Income Guarantee
What constitutes success in preventive health care? A case study in assessing the benefits of hip protectors
The nature of procedural preferences for health-care rationing decisions
Patient preferences in randomised controlled trials
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,48 |
| Citation span | 2003 - 2025 (23) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |