Population-based preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (Ascot) for service users for Austria
Findings from a best-worst experiment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4598718 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Assma Hajji (0000-0001-5204-7036, Vienna University of Economics and Business), Birgit Trukeschitz (0000-0002-2307-4200, Vienna University of Economics and Business, corresponding author), Janet Malley (0000-0001-5759-1647, London School of Economics and Political Science), Laurie Batchelder (0000-0001-5690-9836, University of Kent), Eirini Saloniki (0000-0002-5867-2702, University of Kent), Ismo Linnosmaa (0000-0003-0178-8111, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare), Hui Lu (0000-0002-8545-2537, RAND Europe) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 250 |
| Pages | 112792 |
| Publication date | 2020-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Science & Medicine (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112792 |
| PMID | 32114259 |
| OpenAlex | W2999637642 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 27 |
The paper provides Austrian preference weights for the German version of ASCOT for service users. The weights also provide insight into how Austrians value different LTC-QoL states. Future research may investigate how values for different LTC-QoL states differ between socioeconomic groups
Business · Geography · German · Logistic regression · Mixed logit · Multinomial logistic regression · Population · Preference · Quality of life (healthcare · Scale (ratio · Service (business · Socioeconomic status · Sociology · Statistics · Demography · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Gerontology · Marketing
Supporting the involvement of older adults with complex needs in evaluation of outcomes in long‐term care at home programmes
What’s important when caring for a loved one? Population-based preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for informal carers (Ascot-Carer) for Austria
Norwegian translation and adaptation of the INT4 version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (Ascot)
Best-Worst Scaling
Outcomes of social care for adults
Best–worst scaling
The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models
Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments
Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public
Comparing internet and face-to-face surveys as methods for eliciting preferences for social care-related quality of life
Quality of life instruments for economic evaluations in health and social care for older people
Best–worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments
Using discrete choice experiments to understand preferences for quality of life. Variance-scale heterogeneity matters
Valuing the Icecap capability index for older people
Best worst discrete choice experiments in health
Values for the Icecap-Supportive Care Measure (Icecap-SCM) for use in economic evaluation at end of life
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,6 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |