Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Supporting family carers of people with dementia

A discrete choice experiment of public preferences

Bibliographic Data

ID4598803
AuthorsÁine Teahan (0000-0002-4734-1457, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway, corresponding author), Sharon Walsh (0000-0001-9593-4241, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway), Erin Doherty (0000-0001-8756-8974, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway), Edel Doherty, Eamon O’shea (0000-0002-5521-5987, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway), Eamon O''Shea, Eamon O'Shea
Year2021
Volume287
Pages114359
Publication date2021-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science & Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114359
PMID34530220
OpenAlexW3196888616
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited47

Community-based care for people with dementia is mainly provided by family carers, many of whom experience decreased mental, physical and financial well-being due to their caring role. Many countries are now implementing ageing-in-place policies that have increased pressure on family carers as care-work is redistributed from residential to community-based settings. Family caring responsibilities for people with dementia are made even more complicated by the economic, social and cultural expectations that underpin existing provision. Support for family carers is, therefore, an important policy topic across many countries. The focus of this paper is on the propensity of citizens to support enhanced care for family carers in Ireland, as demonstrated by their willingness-to-pay additional taxation to fund different combinations of carer support measures, developed through careful and sustained dialogue with multiple stakeholders, especially family carers themselves. We carried out a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with 509 members of the general public in Ireland between January and February 2021. Using mixed logit models, our findings show that citizens value four key attributes: regular caring breaks for family carers (day-care and long-break respite); financial compensation (carer's allowance); and emotional support (carer peer support groups). We also estimated the welfare impact of moving from current provision to enhanced support packages for family carers of people with dementia. The welfare gains accumulate to €1035.80 for the most complete levels of provision across the four support attributes. Overall, respondents in this paper showed empathy and understanding towards family carers of people with dementia through their willingness to contribute to funding additional services and supports

Allowance (engineering · Dementia · Empathy · Family caregivers · Family support · Political science · Respite care · Welfare · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • What matters most to the population in case of chronic conditions? Results from a discrete choice experiment in Italy

    Open Access•Milena Vainieri, Veronica Spataro et al.•Health Policy•2025

  • Preferences of patients with severe mental disorders in medical security policies

    Open Access•Wei Lu, Qingzhi Huang et al.•Current Psychology•2025

  • Caregiver preferences and willingness-to-pay for home care services for older people with dementia

    Open Access•Michela Meregaglia, Simone Manfredi et al.•Health Policy•2025

  • Developing a Framework for the Support of Informal Caregivers

    Open Access•Suzanne Cahill, Therése Bielsten et al.•Research on Aging•2023

  • Caregiver support and burden drive intention to engage in a peer-to-peer exchange of services among caregivers of dementia patients

    Open Access•O Zeynep Akşin, Başar Bılgıç et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2023

  • Perspectives on the Person with Dementia and Family Caregiving in Ireland

    Suzanne Cahill•Perspectives on the Person with…•2021

  • Applied Choice Analysis

    Open Access•David A Hensher, Jessica M Rose et al.•Applied Choice Analysis•2015

  • Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses

    Open Access•W Michael Hanemann•American Journal of Agricultural…•1984

  • Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments

    Open Access•Joanna Coast, Hareth Al-Janabi et al.•Health Economics•2012

  • Mixed logit estimation of willingness to pay distributions

    Open Access•Arne R Hole, Julie Riise Kolstad•Empirical Economics•2012

  • Long-term care reforms in OECD countries

    Open Access•Cristiano Gori, Jose-Luis Fernandez et al.•Long-Term Care Reforms in OECD…•2015

  • Long-Term Care Reforms in OECD Countries

    Cristiano Gori, Jose-Luis Fernandez et al.•Long-Term Care Reforms in OECD…•2015

  • Dementia care-giving and employment

    Open Access•Lydia Neubert, Hans-Helmut König et al.•Ageing and Society•2021

  • Supporting working carers

    Open Access•Hilary Arksey, Marjolein Morée•Health & Social Care in the…•2008

  • A “separation of worlds”

    Open Access•Nathan Davies, Nina Walker et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•2019

  • Social participation and family carers of people living with dementia in Australia

    Open Access•Rhonda Nay, Michael Bauer et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•2014

  • A growing care gap? The supply of unpaid care for older people by their adult children in England to 2032

    Open Access•Linda Pickard•Ageing and Society•2015

  • Work restrictions experienced by midlife family care-givers of older people

    Open Access•Andrea Principi, GIOVANNI LAMURA et al.•Ageing and Society•2014

  • Re-conceptualising the relationship between de-familialisation and familialisation and the implications for gender equality – the case of long-term care policies for older people

    Open Access•Thurid Eggers, Christopher Grages et al.•Ageing and Society•2020

  • Carer Break or Carer‐blind? Policies for Informal Carers in the UK

    Open Access•Linda Pickard•Social Policy and Administration•2001

  • Psychosocial factors and public health

    John Macleod, Gregory D Smith•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2003

  • Principles and practice of social security payments for care

    Open Access•Eithne Mclaughlin, Caroline Glendinning•International Social Security…•1994

  • Research Synthesis

    R Baker, Stephen J Blumberg et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2010

  • All in the same boat'? Patient and carer attitudes to peer support and social comparison in Motor Neurone Disease (MND)

    Open Access•Louise Locock, Janice B Brown et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2010

  • Preferences for long-term care services

    Open Access•Anna P Nieboer, Xander Koolman et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2010

  • Incorporating discrete choice experiments into policy decisions

    Open Access•Worawan Chandoevwit, Nada Wasi•Social Science & Medicine•2020

  • Public preferences for home care services for people with dementia

    Open Access•Sharon Walsh, Eamon O’shea et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2020

  • Not all hours are equal

    Open Access•Lyndall Strazdins, Jennifer Welsh et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2016

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1,67
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae