Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Fear, blame and transparency

Obstetric caregivers' rationales for high caesarean section rates in a low-resource setting

Bibliographic Data

ID4600491
AuthorsHelena Litorp (0000-0001-7164-598X, Uppsala University), Andrew Mgaya (0000-0003-3854-9085, Uppsala University), Columba Mbekenga (0000-0002-3322-4057, Uppsala University), Columba K Mbekenga, Hussein L Kidanto, Hussein Kidanto (0000-0001-9167-8068, Uppsala University), Sara Johnsdotter (0000-0002-7625-5873, Malmö University), Birgitta Essén (0000-0002-2900-2849, Uppsala University)
Year2015
Volume143
Pages232-240
Publication date2015-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science & Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.003
PMID26364010
OpenAlexW1850549891
LanguageEN
Citations received18
References cited39

In recent decades, there has been growing attention to the overuse of caesarean section (CS) globally. In light of a high CS rate at a university hospital in Tanzania, we aimed to explore obstetric caregivers' rationales for their hospital's CS rate to identify factors that might cause CS overuse. After participant observations, we performed 22 semi-structured individual in-depth interviews and 2 focus group discussions with 5-6 caregivers in each. Respondents were consultants, specialists, residents, and midwives. The study relied on a framework of naturalistic inquiry and we analyzed data using thematic analysis. As a conceptual framework, we situated our findings in the discussion of how transparency and auditing can induce behavioral change and have unintended effects. Caregivers had divergent opinions on whether the hospital's CS rate was a problem or not, but most thought that there was an overuse of CS. All caregivers rationalized the high CS rate by referring to circumstances outside their control. In private practice, some stated they were affected by the economic compensation for CS, while others argued that unnecessary CSs were due to maternal demand. Residents often missed support from their senior colleagues when making decisions, and felt that midwives pushed them to perform CSs. Many caregivers stated that their fear of blame from colleagues and management in case of poor outcomes made them advocate for, or perform, CSs on doubtful indications. In order to lower CS rates, caregivers must acknowledge their roles as decision-makers, and strive to minimize unnecessary CSs. Although auditing and transparency are important to improve patient safety, they must be used with sensitivity regarding any unintended or counterproductive effects they might have

Audit · Blame · Business · Caesarean section · Focus group · Incentive · Political science · Pregnancy · Psychiatry · Qualitative research · Receipt · Sociology · Tanzania · Thematic analysis · Transparency (behavior · Unintended consequences · Global Maternal and Child Health · Maternal and fetal healthcare · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Accounting

  • Mapping the gendered dynamics of cesarean section

    Open Access•Noah M Trudeau, Kirantheja Daggula et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2026

  • An impact evaluation of the strategy for normal birth care on caesarean section rates and perinatal mortality in Spain

    Open Access•Adela Recio Alcaide, José M Arranz•Health Policy•2022

  • Household- and community-level determinants of low-risk Caesarean deliveries among women in India

    Open Access•Pradeep Kumar, Preeti Dhillon•Journal of Biosocial Science•2021

  • “We do what we can do to save a woman” health workers’ perceptions of health facility readiness for management of postpartum haemorrhage

    Open Access•Fadhlun M Alwy Al‐beity, Andrea Pembe et al.•Global Health Action•2020

  • Factors affecting effective ventilation during newborn resuscitation

    Open Access•Robert Moshiro, Hege Ersdal et al.•Global Health Action•2018

  • Scaling up Locally Adapted Clinical Practice Guidelines for Improving Childbirth Care in Tanzania

    Open Access•Jane Brandt Sørensen, Natasha Housseine et al.•Global Health Action•2022

  • Collective coping work among healthcare providers navigating the precarities of an overburdened maternity facility in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

    Open Access•Haika Osaki, Columba Mbekenga et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2026

  • Understanding Technology in Birth Care from the Experiences of Taiwanese Obstetricians

    Chen‐i Kuan, Chen-I Kuan•East Asian Science Technology and…•2020

  • Safer Births Bundle of Care” Implementation and Perinatal Impact at 30 Hospitals in Tanzania—Halfway Evaluation

    Open Access•Hege Ersdal, Paschal Mdoe et al.•Children•2023

  • Acquiring Knowledge about the Use of a Newly Developed Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitor

    Open Access•Sara Rivenes Lafontan, Johanne Sundby et al.•International Journal of…•2018

  • Determinant of inequality in cesarean delivery in India

    Basant Kumar Panda, Itishree Nayak et al.•Health Care For Women International•2020

  • Systems on the edge

    Open Access•Kate Ramsey•Health Policy and Planning•2022

  • Caesarean section in Benin and Mali

    Open Access•Clémence Schantz, Moufalilou Aboubakar et al.•Reproductive Biomedicine &…•2020

  • Giving Birth While Facing Death

    Open Access•Signe Svallfor•Population Research and Policy…•2024

  • How community and healthcare provider perceptions, practices and experiences influence reporting, disclosure and data collection on stillbirth

    Open Access•Aliki Christou, Ashraful Alam et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2019

  • Competing Narratives

    Open Access•Vania Smith-Oka, Brigitte Flores et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2022

  • The costs of 'free

    Open Access•Isabelle L Lange, Lydie Kanhonou et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2016

  • Obstetric violence in the context of community violence

    Open Access•Orsola Torrisi, Signe Svallfor et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2024

  • What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance?

    Christopher P Hood, Christopher Hood•Public Management Review•2007

  • The Tyranny of Transparency

    M Strathern•Anthropology of Organisations•2017

  • Playing tick-box games

    Open Access•Gerry Mcgivern, Ewan Ferlie•Human Relations•2007

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • A Case-Study in the Functioning of Social Systems as a Defence against Anxiety

    Open Access•Isabel E P Menzies•Human Relations•1960

  • Maintaining Professional Identity

    Open Access•Judith Allsop, Linda Mulcahy•Sociology of Health & Illness•1998

  • Constructing and re-constructing narratives of patient safety

    Open Access•J Waring, Justin J Waring•Social Science & Medicine•2009

  • Reactivity and reactions to regulatory transparency in medicine, psychotherapy and counselling

    Open Access•Gerry Mcgivern, Michael D Fischer•Social Science & Medicine•2012

  • Managing medical mistakes

    Open Access•Terry Mizrahi•Social Science & Medicine•1984

  • Are Brazilian women really choosing to deliver by cesarean

    Open Access•Kristine Hopkins•Social Science & Medicine•2000

  • The Vanishing Mother

    Open Access•Claire L Wendland•Medical Anthropology Quarterly•2007

  • Rankings and Reactivity

    Wendy Nelson Espeland, Michael Sauder•American Journal of Sociology•2007

Unique citing works18
Citations per year1.8
Citation span2016 - 2026 (11)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 18

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae