Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Self-reported versus GPS-derived indicators of daily mobility in a sample of healthy older adults

Bibliographic Data

ID4601924
AuthorsMichelle Pasquale Fillekes (0000-0001-7957-5808, University of Zurich, corresponding author), Christina Röcke (0000-0003-0625-360X, University of Zurich), Marko Katana (0000-0003-2034-0419, University of Zurich), Robert Weibel (0000-0002-2425-0077, University of Zurich)
Year2019
Volume220
Pages193-202
Publication date2019-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science & Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.010
PMID30453111
OpenAlexW2900413055
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited40

In light of novel opportunities to use sensor data to observe individuals' day-to-day mobility in the context of healthy aging research, it is important to understand how meaningful mobility indicators can be extracted from such data and to which degree these sensor-derived indicators are comparable to corresponding self-reports. We used sensor (GPS and accelerometer) and self-reported data from 27 healthy older adults (≥67 years) who participated in the MOASIS project over a 30-day period. Based on sensor data we computed three commonly used daily mobility indicators: life space (LS), travel duration using passive (i.e., motorized) modes of transportation (pMOT) and travel duration using active (i.e., non-motorized) modes of transportation (aMOT). We assessed the degree to which these sensor-derived indicators compare to corresponding self-reports at a within-person level, computing intraindividual correlations (iCorrs), subsequently assessing whether iCorrs can be associated with participants' socio-demographic characteristics on a between-person level. Moderate to large positive mean iCorrs between the respective self-reported and sensor-derived indicators were found (r = 0.75 for LS, 0.51 for pMOT and 0.36 for aMOT). In comparison to sensor-derived indicators, self-reported LS slightly underestimates, while self-reported aMOT as well as pMOT considerably overestimate the amount of daily mobility. Participants with access to a car have higher probabilities of agreement in the pMOT indicator. Sensor-based assessments are promising as they are "objective", involve less participant burden and observations can be extended over long periods. The findings of this paper help researchers on mobility and aging to estimate the magnitude and direction of potential differences in the assessed variable due to the assessment methods

Activities of daily living · Global Positioning System · Physical therapy · Sample (material · Sociology · Telecommunications · Computer Science · Demography · Health disparities and outcomes · Medicine · Older Adults Driving Studies · Psychology · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Gerontology

  • From distance to context

    Open Access•Mackenzie Wallich, Bing Ye et al.•Health & Place•2026

  • Change in GPS-assessed walking locations following a cluster-randomized controlled physical activity trial in older adults, results from the Miparc trial

    Open Access•Katie Crist, Marta M Jankowska et al.•Health & Place•2021

  • Geographical life-space and subjective wellbeing in later life

    Open Access•Linden Douma, Nardi Steverink et al.•Health & Place•2021

  • Cross-validation between GPS-derived trajectories and activity-travel diaries for transport geography studies

    Open Access•Jianying Wang, Yang Liu et al.•Journal of Transport Geography•2025

  • Introduction to the special section

    Open Access•Valorie A Crooks, Jessica Finlay et al.•Canadian Geographies /…•2022

  • Examining the relationship between community mobility and participation using GPS and self-report data

    Open Access•Eugene Brusilovskiy, Louis Klein et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2020

  • Assessing Mobility in Older Adults

    Claire Peel, Patricia Sawyer Baker et al.•Physical Therapy•2005

  • Generating GPS activity spaces that shed light upon the mobility habits of older adults

    Open Access•Joseph A Hirsch, Jana A Hirsch et al.•International Journal of Health…•2014

  • A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults

    Open Access•Stéphanie A Prince, Kristi B Adamo et al.•International Journal of…•2008

  • Compliance and data quality in GPS-based studies

    Open Access•Michal Isaacson, Noam Shoval et al.•Transportation•2016

  • Relationship between Objectively Measured Transportation Behaviors and Health Characteristics in Older Adults

    Open Access•Michelle Takemoto, Jordan A Carlson et al.•International Journal of…•2015

  • Mobility, Disability, and Social Engagement in Older Adults

    Open Access•Andrea L Rosso, Jennifer Taylor et al.•Journal of Aging and Health•2013

  • How many walking and cycling trips made by elderly are beyond commonly used buffer sizes

    Open Access•R G Prins, Frank H Pierik et al.•Health & Place•2014

  • When cities move children

    Open Access•Charlotte Demant Klinker, Jasper Schipperijn et al.•Health & Place•2014

  • Association between neighborhood walkability and GPS-measured walking, bicycling and vehicle time in adolescents

    Open Access•Jordan A Carlson, Brian E Saelens et al.•Health & Place•2015

  • Mobility Research in the Age of the Smartphone

    Amit Birenboim, Noam Shoval•Annals of the American…•2016

  • Numbers and narratives

    Open Access•Louise Meijering, Gerd Weitkamp•Social Science & Medicine•2016

  • Using global positioning systems to study health-related mobility and participation

    Open Access•Eugene Brusilovskiy, Louis Klein et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2016

  • Assessing patterns of spatial behavior in health studies

    Open Access•Camille Perchoux, Yan Kestens et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2014

  • A grounded visualization approach to explore sociospatial and temporal complexities of older adults' mobility

    Open Access•Todd Franke, Thea Franke et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2017

Unique citing works6
Citations per year1
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae