Decision making in a clinical trial for a life-threatening illness
Therapeutic expectation, not misconception
Bibliographic Data
Potential participants for clinical trials which aim to define treatments for life-threatening conditions are often extremely unwell. When exploring why individuals participate in clinical trials one common observation is a misplaced expectation of personal benefit - a therapeutic misconception. The care offered in some clinical trials is of a higher standard than is routinely available and this has led to criticism around the freedom of choice to enrol - structural coercion. We embedded an ethnographic study within a randomised controlled trial for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis in Gaborone, Botswana and Kampala, Uganda. We aimed to gain an understanding of decision-making around the trial and how this was impacted by the study design and broader social context. We conducted in-depth interviews with trial participants, surrogate decision makers and researchers, combined these with direct observations and analysed data using thematic analysis. Between January 2020 and June 2021 we interviewed 89 individuals. We found previous exposure to and awareness of clinical research was limited, as was understanding of the trial objectives and design. Through observations and engagement with healthcare facilities decision-makers were able to identify the trial as providing the best possible chance of survival. Hesitation and reluctance were mostly due to fear of lumbar punctures which was sometimes based on rumours but often based on tragic personal experience. Despite fear, and sometimes conviction that they would die, individuals agreed to consent, often against the wishes of family members. Reassurance and confidence came from trust in routine care staff and the research team but also from fellow participants and their surrogates. We argue that participants made informed decisions based on a therapeutic expectation from the trial and that rather than being the result of structural coercion this was an informed and voluntary choice
Alternative medicine · Clinical trial · Context (archaeology · Family medicine · Health care · Informed consent · Psychiatry · Qualitative research · Research ethics · Thematic analysis · Ethics in Clinical Research · Medicine · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
False Hopes and Best Data
Negotiating agency in cases of intimate partner violence in Vietnam
Women's responses to intimate partner violence in Rwanda
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial
Understanding of informed consent in a low-income setting
An evaluation of the informed consent procedure used during a trial of a Haemophilus influenzae type B conjugate vaccine undertaken in The Gambia, West Africa
He is now like a brother, I can even give him some blood' - Relational ethics and material exchanges in a malaria vaccine 'trial community' in The Gambia
Trust and informed consent
Resources, Agency, Achievements
The 'empty choice
What Is Life Worth? Exploring Biomedical Interventions, Survival, and the Politics of Life
Empty ethics
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2024 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |