Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The 'Partnership' Hoax

How the British Government Deprived Central Africans of their Rights

Bibliographic Data

ID4604446
AuthorsRobert I Rotberg (Harvard University, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume45
Issue1
Pages89-110
Publication date2019-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Southern African Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0305-7070 • E-ISSN: 1465-3893
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03057070.2019.1558654
OpenAlexW2913759193
LanguageEN
Citations received9

British governments connived with Rhodesian settlers to transform their ‘protected’ Central African wards into junior ‘partners’ of whites in an attempt to solve a series of Africa-wide problems that threatened sustainable colonial rule. Multiracial ‘partnership’ was a ruse to divert African self-rule initiatives and to concoct a compromise that would preserve white dominance. The genesis of the federation movement in central Africa is well-known, but not the precise invention of ‘partnership’. Without ‘partnership’ there would have been no Federation and, conceivably, different triumphs of African nationalism. This article examines the intellectual odyssey that resulted in the articulation of the idea of multiracial ‘partnership’; the role of the Colonial Office, governors, particular churchmen and the Capricorn Africa Society in promoting ‘partnership’; how cynicism and sleight of hand came to dominate the official imperial debate over African rights; the profound rejection of these initiatives by Africans; the immediate and lasting consequences in Central Africa of ‘partnership’; and what the failed foisting of ‘partnership’ upon wards of the Crown tells us about the underlying ethics of colonialism

Colonialism · Compromise · General partnership · Government (linguistics · Nationalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · African history and culture studies · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · Law · Public Administration

  • African opinion and the Commonwealth

    Open Access•Siyabonga Njica•The Round Table•2026

  • The African Dimension to the Anti-Federation Struggle, ca. 1950–53

    Open Access•Rob Power•Itinerario•2021

  • Challenging the Hero Narrative

    Open Access•Gary Walsh•Societies•2020

  • Operation Refugee

    Brooks Marmon•Cold War History•2021

  • From Federation to ‘White Redoubt’

    Open Access•Niels Boender•The Journal of Imperial &…•2023

  • Settler Worldmaking

    Open Access•Brooks Marmon•Itinerario•2022

  • Bogey Bogey Stuff’

    Brooks Marmon•The Round Table•2022

  • The Colonial African

    Open Access•Sishuwa, Duncan Money•The Journal of African History•2024

  • Federation, Partnership, and the Chronologies of Space in 1950s East and Central Africa

    Open Access•Ismay Milford•The Historical Journal•2020

Unique citing works9
Citations per year1,5
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae