Comparative Environmental Federalism
Subsidiarity and Central Regulation in the United States and China
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4610199 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Huiyu Zhao (Shanghai University, autor correspondente), Robert Percival, Robert V Percival (University of Maryland, Baltimore) |
| Ano | 2017 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 531-549 |
| Data de publicação | 2017-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Transnational Environmental Law (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2047-1025 • E-ISSN: 2047-1033 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s2047102517000206 |
| OpenAlex | W2741562228 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 8 |
| Referências citadas | 15 |
The proper division of responsibility for environmental protection between national and state governments has long been the subject of fierce debate. During the 1970s the United States Congress decided to shift the most important environmental responsibilities from state governments to the federal government. The main reason for this decision was to prevent a 'race to the bottom' in that states competing for industries could otherwise be lax in implementing and enforcing federal environmental standards. Yet, some scholars have argued that there could just as easily be a 'race to the top' among states as they compete to attract people and businesses concerned with environmental protection. China, in turn, is plagued with severe air and water pollution and soil contamination, which is attributed largely to ineffective enforcement of its national environmental laws. This article investigates whether China's experience confirms the race-to-the-bottom theory. It demonstrates that devolution of responsibility for environmental protection to lower levels of government tends to result in lax implementation and enforcement of national environmental laws, particularly where national governments also create strong incentives for economic growth. It concludes that China's highly devolved system of environmental governance is consistent with this theory, even if it does not provide conclusive evidence of its correctness
Business · China · Corporate governance · Enforcement · Environmental governance · Environmental law · European union · Federalism · Globalization · International trade · Political science · Race to the bottom · Race to the Top · Sociology · Subsidiarity · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Law · Public Administration
Beyond central-local relations
Centralization or decentralization? the impact of different distributions of authority on China's environmental regulation
Authoritarian energy transitions undermined? Environmental governance cycles in China’s power sector
Joint prevention and control mechanism for air pollution regulations in China
Multilevel policy textual learning in Chinese local environmental policies
Expanding the Scope of Transnational Environmental Law
Transnational Environmental Law's Missing People
Surveying the Chemical Anthropocene
Green Giants?
Authoritarian Environmentalism Undermined? Local Leaders’ Time Horizons and Environmental Policy Implementation in China
State Capacity and Local Agent Control in China
The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale
Performance Management, High-Powered Incentives, and Environmental Policies in China
The Fundamental Institutions of China's Reforms and Development
Institutionalized governance processes
The Knight Sugar Decision of 1895 and The Modernization of American Corporation Law, 1869–1903
Trade Competition and Environmental Regulations
Normative Beliefs in State Policy Choice
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,89 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2017 - 2025 (9) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 8 |