Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Everybody wants to coach it, but fewer know how to do it

A Qualitative Study of Stakeholders' Perspectives on Mental Skill Development in Youth Sports

Bibliographic Data

ID4615207
AuthorsP Muller (0009-0009-3104-8318, corresponding author), Philippe O Müller, Ulrike Schwarzer, Dave Collins (0000-0002-7601-0454), Renato Frey (0000-0002-3190-3523), Jörg Spörri (0000-0002-0353-1021)
Year2025
Volume7
Pages1633943-1633943
Publication date2025-09-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Sports and Active Living (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2624-9367 • E-ISSN: 2624-9367
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fspor.2025.1633943
PMID41018809
OpenAlexW4414262272
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited64

Background/objectivesIn recent years, the role of psychological training in youth sports has received increasing attention in both research and practice. The development of mental skills is important for sporting excellence, as it improves performance and helps athletes grow in their personality. This study aimed to explore the views of a wide range of stakeholders in youth sports on current practices, challenges, and opportunities related to mental skill development programs. With its comprehensive, multi-perspective approach, it provides novel insights into how such programs are perceived and implemented across different roles in youth sports.MethodsFifteen semi-structured qualitative interviews with coaches and sport psychologists from multiple countries were conducted. The data were transcribed verbatim and the primary inductive process was based on constant comparative analysis employing the principles of Grounded Theory. In addition, a subsequent deductive process involved qualitative content analysis. Finally, the inductively and deductively derived outcomes were compared and the key conclusions of the study were formed via abductive reasoning.ResultsThe interviewees highlighted the importance of organizational structure, personal interactions and standardized processes for the successful implementation of mental skills development programs. They considered clearly defined roles and responsibilities to be crucial to the systematic development of mental skills in athletes. The most common barriers identified were limited financial and human resources. In addition, the implementation process was described as often hampered by a lack of knowledge among decision makers about the benefits of systematically developing mental skills. Improved interdisciplinary collaboration (e.g., between teachers, coaches, parents and sports psychologists) was reported to be key to optimizing resource allocation and facilitating the development of mental skills.ConclusionThe results suggest that systematically integrating mental skills development into youth sports requires institutional support, stakeholder engagement, and interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure its application, implementation, and sustainability. Accordingly, mental skills development programs should be embedded in organizational strategies and policies. This clarifies responsibilities and allows for the development of appropriate measures. A key aspect of such integration is providing knowledge about successful, healthy mental skill development pathways and appropriate intervention measures to all stakeholders

Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports · Sport Psychology and Performance · Youth Development and Social Support

  • Design and evaluation of leadership development program using co-creation approaches for an athlete leadership group among elite high school rugby teams

    Open Access•Toshiaki Hirose, Yasutaka Ojio et al.•Frontiers in Sports and Active…•2026

  • Grounded theory research

    Open Access•Ylona Chun Tie, Melanie Birks et al.•SAGE Open Medicine•2019

  • Developing rigor in qualitative research

    Brett Smith, Kerry Rebecca Mcgannon•International Review of Sport and…•2018

  • Systematic methodological review

    Open Access•Hanna Kallio, Anna‐maija Pietilä et al.•Journal of Advanced Nursing•2016

  • The qualitative content analysis process

    Open Access•Satu Elo, Helvi Kyngäs•Journal of Advanced Nursing•2008

  • A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative Interviews

    Open Access•Hennie Boeije•Quality & Quantity•2002

  • Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)

    A Jaure, A Tong et al.•International Journal for Quality…•2007

  • The Discovery of Grounded Theory

    Barney G Glaser, Anselm L Strauss•Discovery of Grounded Theory•2017

  • The Theory-Generating Expert Interview

    Open Access•Alexander Bogner, Wolfgang Menz•Interviewing Experts•2009

  • Saturation in qualitative research

    Open Access•Benjamin Saunders, Joe Sims et al.•Quality & Quantity•2017

  • ‘More than a game’

    Maureen R Weiss, Cheryl P Stuntz et al.•Qualitative Research in Sport and…•2013

  • The pursuit of quality in grounded theory

    Open Access•Kathy Charmaz, Robert Thornberg•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2020

  • The qualitative research interview

    Open Access•Barbara Dicicco-Bloom, Barbara DiCicco‐Bloom et al.•Medical Education•2006

  • Member Checking

    Open Access•Linda Birt, Suzanne Scott et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2016

  • Philosophical Paradigms, Grounded Theory, and Perspectives on Emergence

    Open Access•Merry-Jo D Levers•SAGE Open•2013

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae