Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds

Bibliographic Data

ID4615483
AuthorsJoaquin Navajas (0000-0001-8765-037X, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, corresponding author), Tamara Niella (0009-0004-1906-2647, University of Oregon), Gerry Garbulsky, Beebe Bahrami (0000-0003-0802-5328), Bahador Bahrami (0000-0001-8496-2255, University College London), Marian Sigman (0000-0003-0589-0033, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella), Mariano Sigman (0000-0002-5590-8687)
Year2018
Volume2
Issue2
Pages126-132
Publication date2018-01-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNature Human Behaviour (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2397-3374 • E-ISSN: 2397-3374
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1038/s41562-017-0273-4
OpenAlexW2783218188
LanguageEN
Citations received29
References cited46

Computer security · Crowds · Data science · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Computer Science · Data Visualization and Analytics · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology

  • Does School Debating Reduce Vulnerability to Misinformation? A Field Experiment in Poland

    Krzysztof Krakowski, Bernhard Clemm Von Hohenberg et al.•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • Using the Delphi Method to Establish Expert Consensus

    Open Access•Anthony F Jorm•Using the Delphi Method to…•2025

  • Divisive negative discourse biases social experience

    Open Access•Joaquín Ponferrada, Jeremias Inchauspe et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Data sharing in learning analytics

    Open Access•Louis Longin, Deisy Briceno et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Agenda Setting and The Emperor’s New Clothes

    Open Access•Emory Richardson, Isaac Davis et al.•Open MIND•2025

  • The Diversity Gap

    Open Access•Justin Sulik, Beebe Bahrami et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2022

  • Crowds Can Effectively Identify Misinformation at Scale

    Open Access•Cameron Martel, Jennifer Allen et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2024

  • Exploiting Meta-cognitive Features for a Machine-Learning-Based One-Shot Group-Decision Aggregation

    Open Access•Hilla Shinitzky, Dan Avraham et al.•Group Decision and Negotiation•2024

  • Opting out in computer-supported sequential collaboration

    Open Access•Maren Mayer, Daniel W Heck et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2025

  • Training pre-service teachers to deal with cyberbullying

    Open Access•Pablo Bautista, Eva Vicente et al.•Computers & Education•2024

  • Moral education and the psychology of moral discourse

    Nora Heinzelmann•Journal of Moral Education•2025

  • Extremists are more confident

    Open Access•Nora Heinzelmann, Viet Tran•Erkenntnis•2024

  • The Paradox of Interaction

    Open Access•Bei Yan, Lian Jian et al.•Communication Research•2021

  • Collective intelligence as collective information processing

    Open Access•Zara Anwarzai, Cody Moser et al.•Cognition•2026

  • Social interoception

    Open Access•Mariana Von Mohr, Gianluca Finotti et al.•Cognition•2023

  • Does discussion make crowds any wiser

    Open Access•Hugo Mercier, Nicolas Claidière•Cognition•2022

  • Valuation of ecosystem services and social choice

    Open Access•Mariam Maki Sy, Charles Figuieres et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2022

  • Intuitions about the epistemic virtues of majority voting

    Hugo Mercier, Martin Dockendorff et al.•Thinking & Reasoning•2020

  • Majority views and confidence information promote informed decisions

    Open Access•Yunwen He, Jaimie W Lien et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

  • The Wisdom of the Small Crowd

    Open Access•Edoardo Baccini, Zoé Christoff et al.•Journal of Artificial Societies…•2023

  • Wisdom of stakeholder crowds in complex social–ecological systems

    Open Access•Payam Aminpour, Steven A Gray et al.•Nature Sustainability•2020

  • Prescribing Agreement Improves Judgments and Decisions

    Open Access•Pavel V Voinov, Günther Knoblich•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2024

  • Collaboration during the diagnostic decision‐making process

    Open Access•Juliane E Kämmer, Karin Ernst et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2023

  • Getting it right

    Open Access•Valeria Burdea, Jonathan Woon•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • Deliberation and confidence change

    Open Access•Nora Heinzelmann, Stephan Hartmann•Synthese•2022

  • Wise teamwork

    Open Access•Ike Silver, Barbara A Mellers et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2021

  • Working the Crowd

    Open Access•Philippe Mongrain, Nadjim Fréchet et al.•Canadian Journal of Political…•2025

  • A new sociology of humans and machines

    Open Access•Milena Tsvetkova, Taha Yasseri et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2024

  • Shared responsibility in collective decisions

    Open Access•Marwa El Zein, Beebe Bahrami et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2019

  • Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers

    Open Access•Lu Hong, Sarah E Page et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2004

  • Social Influence Bias

    Open Access•Lev Muchnik, Sinan Aral et al.•Science•2013

  • Opinions and Social Pressure

    Solomon E Asch•Scientific American•1955

  • An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts

    Open Access•Norman C Dalkey, Norman Dalkey et al.•Management Science•1963

  • Optimally Interacting Minds

    Open Access•Bahador Bahrami, Karsten Olsen et al.•Science•2010

  • Does Rejection Hurt? An fMRI Study of Social Exclusion

    Open Access•Naomi I Eisenberger, Matthew D Lieberman et al.•Science•2003

  • Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory

    Open Access•Hugo Mercier, Dan Sperber•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2011

  • How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect

    Open Access•Jan Lorenz, Heiko Rauhut et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2011

  • Taking Advice

    Open Access•Nigel Harvey, Ilan Fischer•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1997

  • Vox Populi

    Open Access•Francis Galton•Nature•1907

  • Judgment under Uncertainty

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Utility, Probability, and Human…•1975

  • When prophecy fails

    Leon Festinger, Henry W Riecken et al.•University of Minnesota Press…•1956

  • Infotopia How Many Minds Produce Knowledge

    Cass R Sunstein•Infotopia•2006

  • Majoritarian democracy undermines truth-finding in deliberative committees

    Open Access•J Lorenz, Heiko Rauhut et al.•Research & Politics•2015

  • The Power of Social Influence on Estimation Accuracy

    Open Access•Burcu Gürçay, Barbara A Mellers et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2014

  • Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal

    Open Access•James S Fishkin, James Fishkin et al.•Acta Politica•2005

  • Detecting outliers

    Open Access•Colin Leys, Christophe Leys et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2013

  • The wisdom of select crowds

    Albert E Mannes, Jack B Soll et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2014

  • Deliberation and disagreement

    Open Access•Hélène Landemore, Sarah E Page et al.•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2014

  • The group polarization phenomenon

    David G Myers, Helmut Lamm•Psychological Bulletin•1976

  • Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Theorem

    Open Access•David Austen-Smith, David Austen‐smith et al.•American Political Science Review•1996

Unique citing works29
Citations per year4,14
Citation span2019 - 2026 (8)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 28

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae