The Future of the Ordnance Survey

The statement by the Secretary of State on the future of the Ordnance Survey has created a speculative and uneasy situation. It is important that those who advise on these matters have an informed appreciation of the business of our national survey organization. There is no advantage in setting up a trading fund for the Ordnance Survey: it was rejected by Government in 1973 and the pros and cons have not changed. The report by the Serpell Committee is held in high esteem. The advice now being prepared for the Secretary of State on possible future structures and on ways of involving the private sector must inspire the same degree of confidence. The basic scale survey of the country is an inheritance which must be properly maintained; it is necessary for efficient planning and public administration. Consistency is essential. This does not, however, preclude participation by private sector firms which have suitably qualified professional and technical staff. Change of methods must be carefully controlled to ensure the necessary standards. The record of our national survey is excellent and the cost is small for the service provided. Let the advantage of any major change be properly proven before it be introduced

Geography · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Geology

• Cartography , mapping and geographic information

  Open Access•Mark Monmonier, Mark Stephen Monmonier•Progress in Human Geography•1983

  Add to list