Evolutionary perspective of the genus Homo
New Approaches
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4635399 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Martín Caparrós (0000-0001-7356-610X, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Miguel Caparros, Sandrine Prat (0000-0003-3024-1959, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | S |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cahiers du Centre de recherches anthropologiques (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1297-7810 • E-ISSN: 1777-5469 |
| Publisher | OpenEdition (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4000/bmsap.6967 |
| OpenAlex | W3160887563 |
| Language | EN |
No consensus exists in human evolution research regarding the definition of genus Homo and its mode of evolution. Based on a database that comprises more than 350 characters scored on 22 hominin species from Late Miocene to Holocene, we address methodologically these two questions with a quantitative taxonomic approach that combines Maximum Parsimony (MP) phylogenetic reconstruction with a Phylogenetic Networks method. Based on tree-based MP, we identify three Homo most parsimonious definitio
Biology · Clade · Evolutionary biology · Genus · Maximum parsimony · Perspective (graphical · Phylogenetic tree · Phylogenetics · Zoology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Evolution and Paleontology Studies · Genetics · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology · Primate Behavior and Ecology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |