Reducing academic flying beyond Covid-19
Drivers, alternatives, and avenues for change
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4644836 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bram Van De Glind (0000-0002-0783-7546, Department of International Environment and Development Studies (Noragric) Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU) Ås Norway, corresponding author), Erik Gomez‐baggethun (0000-0003-2690-2101, Department of International Environment and Development Studies (Noragric) Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU) Ås Norway) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 189 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 300-313 |
| Publication date | 2023-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Geographical Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0016-7398 • E-ISSN: 1475-4959 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/geoj.12471 |
| OpenAlex | W4289861623 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 61 |
This paper seeks to advance our understanding of the underlying reasons that sustain high levels of academic flying, and examines how a low-carbon academia with less air travel might come about. Data from 30 interviews with academics showed that expectations of internationalisation, networking, and ideals of a productive academic stand among the strongest drivers of academic flying. These drivers come forth from underlying objectives such as pursuing excellence in research and working towards successful careers. Findings from this research suggest that institutional and cultural change are prerequisites to mainstream practical alternatives to academic flying, such as wider use of digital communication tools, grounded travelling, and low-carbon conferences and meetings. We see a role for universities, grant-providing authorities, and other academic organisations to include environmental standards and criteria in internationalisation strategies, the concept of excellence, and funding evaluation processes. From our analysis of academics' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, we identify three factors that appear essential in determining whether digital communication tools can substitute for physical presence: (1) desired type of interaction, (2) existing social relations among participants, and (3) number of participants. Finally, we discuss whether and to what extent voluntary guidelines, the adoption of digital tools, and other soft measures may lead to cuts in academic flying at the scale and pace required for meeting climate targets, suggesting that enforcing limits on academic air travel might be unavoidable
Business · Excellence · Geography · Internationalization · Mainstream · Pace · Political science · Public relations · Scale (ratio · Sociology · Conferences and Exhibitions Management · Sport and Mega-Event Impacts · Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
Decarbonising air travel in higher education institutions
A framework to promote sustainable air travel in higher education
“We don't have other options”
Developing appropriate climate actions related to business travel at a Finnish university
Academic Air Travel
Ethical conference economies? Reimagining the costs of convening academic communities when moving online
Student Mobilities, Migration and the Internationalization of Higher Education
The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018
Are technology myths stalling aviation climate policy?
Academic air travel has a limited influence on professional success
Virtual communication curbs creative idea generation
Does ‘flight shame’ affect social norms? Changing perspectives on the desirability of air travel in Germany
The environmental footprint of academic and student mobility in a large research-oriented university
Covid-19 and the academy
A Call for Slow Scholarship
Meet & fly
Socio-occupational and geographical determinants of the frequency of long-distance business travel in France
Use of aviation by climate change researchers
The global scale, distribution and growth of aviation
Hovering on the periphery? ‘Decolonising’ writing for academic journals
The carbon footprint of a knowledge organization and emission scenarios for a post-Covid-19 world
Internationalisation, Mobility and Metrics
Academic flying, climate change, and ethnomusicology
Meeting in the Global Workplace
Qualitative research methods for the social sciences
The work-sociology of academic aeromobility at remote institutions
Mobility and Professional Networks in Academia
Practising academic mobilities
The time of their lives? Academic workers in neoliberal time(s)
Global patterns in the publishing of academic knowledge
The elephant in the sky
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |