Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Where the wild places are

Factors associated with people's favourite local and national wild place in the United Kingdom

Bibliographic Data

ID4662278
AuthorsEmily K Madsen (0000-0003-4108-6608, Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Biology University of Oxford Oxford UK), Mike Daniels (0009-0003-4345-8169, The John Muir Trust Pitlochry UK), Clara Montgomery (The John Muir Trust Pitlochry UK), Norman Stillman (0000-0001-6991-7923, The Alan Turing Institute London UK), Nicola Homer (0009-0009-3573-1739, The Alan Turing Institute London UK), Nick Homer (The Alan Turing Institute), Cristín Lambert (The John Muir Trust Pitlochry UK), Darragh Hare (0000-0003-4418-9637, Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Biology University of Oxford Oxford UK)
Year2025
Volume191
Issue1
Publication date2025-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGeographical Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0016-7398 • E-ISSN: 1475-4959
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/geoj.12607
OpenAlexW4402452239
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited45

Protected areas globally serve as crucial sanctuaries for biodiversity, playing a pivotal role in conserving endangered species and maintaining ecological balance. In the United Kingdom (UK), 25% of land is currently designated as public protected areas and discussions are underway regarding the implementation of new protected areas, including the establishment of new National Parks in all four nations of the UK. Wild places have an important role to play in understanding and deciding where public protected areas should or could be. People form profound connections to wild places locally and nationally. We used two online surveys to gather information on the UK public's local and national favourite wild places, and the characteristics of those places which make them their top choice. Our analysis revealed that respondents preferred different wild places based on their survey group, with significant differences in the importance placed on characteristics like 'Accessibility', 'Nature' and 'Scenery' across local and national scales. Demographic factors, including age and settlement, had some impact, but the overall importance of characteristics like 'Peace and Quiet' and 'Nature' were consistently high across both surveys. Recognising the prevalence of favourite wild places outside of designated areas underscores the importance of engaging the different viewpoints of the public in conservation initiatives, and indicates that public support for conservation might extend beyond officially protected regions

Biology · Favourite · Geography · Kingdom · Political science · Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research · Law · Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management · Urban Green Space and Health

  • A process‐based social‐ecological systems framework for studying the effects of human recreation on wildlife

    Open Access•Amber Cowans, Darragh Hare et al.•People and Nature•2026

  • Beyond message framing

    Open Access•Jessica Frater, Mike Daniels et al.•People and Nature•2025

  • An Ecoregion-Based Approach to Protecting Half the Terrestrial Realm

    Open Access•E Dinerstein, David Olson et al.•BioScience•2017

  • Engaging with the natural environment

    Open Access•Joe Hinds, Paul Sparks•Journal of Environmental Psychology•2008

  • A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas

    Open Access•Johan A Oldekop, George Holmes et al.•Conservation Biology•2016

  • A Global Deal For Nature

    Open Access•E Dinerstein, C Vynne et al.•Science Advances•2019

  • Inclusion with Nature

    P Wesley Schultz•Psychology of Sustainable…•2002

  • Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation

    Open Access•Eleanor J Sterling, Erin Betley et al.•Biological Conservation•2017

  • Contributions of Scottish community woodlands to local wellbeing before and during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Matthew J Logan, Patrick Metzger et al.•Scottish Geographical Journal•2021

  • Accounting for diversity

    Open Access•Richard C Edwards, Brendon M H Larson•Landscape and Urban Planning•2022

  • Favourite places for outdoor recreation

    Open Access•Jonathan Stoltz, Carl Lehto et al.•People and Nature•2024

  • Speaking a common language on what should count for protecting 30% by 2030

    Open Access•Stephen Woodley, Madhu Rao et al.•PARKS•2021

  • Cultural Keystone Places

    Open Access•A Cuerrier, Nancy J Turner et al.•Journal of Ethnobiology•2015

  • Outdoor Activities Associated with Lower Odds of Sars-CoV-2 Acquisition

    Open Access•Tommaso C Bulfone, Cinthia Blat et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Exploring the Relationship Between Local Support and the Success of Protected Areas

    Open Access•George Holmes•Conservation and Society•2013

  • Perceived tranquility in green urban open spaces

    Lawal M Marafa, Felix K H Tsang et al.•World Leisure & Recreation•2018

  • The Importance of Nature, Green Spaces, and Gardens in Human Well-Being

    Isis Brook•Ethics Place & Environment•2010

  • Can public participation increase nature conservation effectiveness

    Małgorzata Grodzińska-Jurczak, Joanna Cent•Innovation The European Journal…•2011

  • A Spatial Analysis of Linkages between Health Care Expenditures, Physical Inactivity, Obesity and Recreation Supply

    Randall S Rosenberger, Yoav Sneh et al.•Journal of Leisure Research•2005

  • The Social Construction of Nature

    James D Proctor•Annals of the Association of…•1998

  • Wilderness” revisited

    Open Access•Megan Youdelis, Roberta Nakoochee et al.•Canadian Geographies /…•2020

  • Nature, wellbeing and the transformational self

    Open Access•Jo Little•Geographical Journal•2014

  • The Trouble with Wilderness

    William Cronon•Environmental History•1996

  • Wilderness use, conservation and tourism

    Juha Saarinen•Tourism Geographies•2016

  • Wildness as vitality

    Open Access•Phillip Vannini, April Vannini et al.•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2019

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae