Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Woodworking in the Bronze Age Southern Trans-Urals (the case study of the fortified settlement of Kamenny Ambar)

Bibliographic Data

ID4662844
AuthorsL N Koryakova (0000-0003-4861-344X, Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of History, corresponding author), I V Molchanov (0000-0001-5668-6310, Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of History)
Year2020
Issue4 (51
Pages17-30
Publication date2020-11-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueVestnik arheologii, antropologii i ètnografii (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1811-7465 • E-ISSN: 2071-0437
PublisherTyumen Scientific Center of the SB RAS (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.20874/2071-0437-2020-51-4-2
OpenAlexW3110714817
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited13

The paper presents the description and analysis of the collection of wood (formwork elements and objects) from wells of the Bronze Age fortified settlement of Kamenny Ambar (Chelyabinsk Oblast). Within the settlement, presented are the layers of the Sintashta, Petrovka and Srubnaya-Alakul traditions, covering the period of the 21st-17th c. BC. We give a short description of the forest resources of the study area. In Southern Urals, wood can be found in the form of charred remains, sometimes in post holes, in burial structures of various state of preserva-tion, as well as in the Bronze Age wells. The latter has been the source of fragments of formwork and some household items for this study. According to palaeobotanical data, the local landscape represented forests mixed with steppe and forb meadows. The total area of forestlands around the settlement in the Bronze Age was roughly similar to the modern one. The analysis of charcoal and wood from wells indicates that pine (51 %) and birch (47 %) were the most common, and to a lesser extent - willow and alder (2 %). Prevailing were the pine trunks with 5 to 30, less often 50, rings. The types of formwork and tools used in their construction have been determined. The importance of woodworking among the household industries of the settlement has been assessed. Remains of wooden structures have been found on the bottom of 16 examined wells, although there may have been more, judging by discrete fragments of wood decay. The wood is represented by stakes, half-logs, chopping blocks, planks, branches, charcoal and fragments of bark. Restored specimens have been examined visually and using a microscope in order to determine the wood species and process tools, and the results have been put down into the database. In the process of excavation, two types of formwork were identified: 1) a wattle cylinder made of twigs intertwined through vertical stakes, and 2) sheeting of the shaft with vertically placed and tightly fitted boards and/or half-logs of small diameter. In a number of wells, the type of construction could not be accurately determined. In addition to wooden structures, wooden objects were also found at the bottom of several wells. It is possible to state that the inhabitants of the Kamenny Ambar settlement were skilled in wood processing. Available data indicate that carpentry craft was highly developed throughout the entire Bronze Age period. Admittedly, peo-ple knew how to joint wooden parts of structures. Since there are no finds of metal nails, we are confident that they used alternative means, such as ropes and other carpentry techniques, in particular, groove joining. An ob-ject with a precise rectangular groove was found in one of the wells. These materials demonstrate the presence of good engineering knowledge, manifested not only in the search for new technologies for the well construction, but also in the overall architecture of the settlement

Archaeology · Beaker · Biology · Botany · Bronze · Bronze Age · Charcoal · Geography · Hearth · Willow · Woodworking · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Chemistry · Soil and Environmental Studies · Tree-ring climate responses · Forestry

  • Morphometric characteristics of the bovine bones from the excavations of the Bronze Age site of Gonur-depe

    Open Access•R M Sataev, L V Sataeva•Vestnik arheologii, antropologii…•2023

  • Chronological relationship between the fortified settlement of Kamennyi Ambar and the Kamennyi Ambar-5 cemetery in the Southern Trans-Urals

    Open Access•Igor V Chechushkov, A V Epimakhov•Vestnik arheologii, antropologii…•2021

  • Labor Investments in the Construction of the Kamenny Ambar Late Bronze Age Settlement in the Karagaily-Ayat River Valley

    Open Access•Igor V Chechushkov•Ural Historical Journal•2020

  • Preliminary Report on the Middle Neolithic Well from Sajószentpéter (North-Eastern Hungary)

    Open Access•Ágnes Király, Krisztián Tóth•Dissertationes Archaeologicae•2016

  • Bronze Age human–landscape interactions in the southern Transural steppe, Russia – Evidence from high-resolution palaeobotanical studies

    Open Access•Astrid Stobbe, Maren Gumnior et al.•The Holocene•2016

  • Palynological and sedimentological evidence from the Trans-Ural steppe (Russia) and its palaeoecological implications for the sudden emergence of Bronze Age sedentarism

    Open Access•Astrid Stobbe, Maren Gumnior et al.•Vegetation History and…•2014

  • Archaeobotanical analysis of plant use at Kamennyi Ambar, a Bronze Age fortified settlement of the Sintashta culture in the southern Trans-Urals steppe, Russia

    Open Access•Lisa Rühl, Christoph Herbig et al.•Vegetation History and…•2014

  • Archaeological studies of the Kamenny Ambar (Olgino) fortified settlement

    Open Access•L N Koryakova, Rüdiger Krause et al.•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2011

  • Investigation of wooden burial structures in the process of archaeological excavations

    Open Access•P Mylnikov, V P Mylnikov•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2012

  • Peat-Bog Sites in the Eastern Urals

    Open Access•N M Chairkina•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2010

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,4
Citation span2021 - 2023 (3)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae