Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Constant low-to-moderate mechanical asymmetries during 800-m track running

Bibliographic Data

ID4683433
AuthorsOlivier Girard (0000-0002-4797-182X, The University of Western Australia), Grégoire P Millet (0000-0001-8081-4423, University of Lausanne, corresponding author), Jean-Paul Micallef, Jean‐paul Micallef (Université de Montpellier)
Year2024
Volume6
Pages1278454-1278454
Publication date2024-01-19
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Sports and Active Living (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2624-9367 • E-ISSN: 2624-9367
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fspor.2024.1278454
PMID38313218
OpenAlexW4391033453
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited34

IntroductionModifications in asymmetry in response to self-paced efforts have not been thoroughly documented, particularly regarding horizontally-derived ground reaction force variables. We determined the magnitude and range of gait asymmetries during 800 m track running.MethodsEighteen physical education students completed an 800 m self-paced run on a 200 m indoor track. During the run, vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces were measured at a sampling frequency of 500 Hz using a 5 m-long force platform system, with data collected once per lap. The following mechanical variables were determined for two consecutive steps: contact time and duration of braking/push-off phases along with vertical/braking/push-off peak forces and impulses. The group mean asymmetry scores were evaluated using the "symmetry angle" (SA) formula, where scores of 0% and 100% correspond to perfect symmetry and perfect asymmetry, respectively.ResultsThere was no influence of distance interval on SA scores for any of the nine biomechanical variables (P ≥ 0.095). The SA scores were ∼1%-2% for contact time (1.3 ± 0.5%), peak vertical forces (1.8 ± 0.9%), and vertical impulse (1.7 ± 1.0%). The SA scores were ∼3%-8% for duration of braking (3.6 ± 1.1%) and push-off (3.2 ± 1.4%) phases, peak braking (5.0 ± 2.1%) and push-off (6.9 ± 3.1%) forces as well as braking (7.6 ± 2.3%) and push-off (7.7 ± 3.3%) impulses. The running velocity progressively decreased at 300 m and 500 m compared to that at 100 m but levelled off at 700 m (P < 0.001).DiscussionThere were no modifications in gait asymmetries, as measured at 200-m distance intervals during 800-m track running in physical education students. The 800 m self-paced run did not impose greater mechanical constraints on one side of the body. Experimental procedures for characterizing the gait pattern during 800 m track running could be simplified by collecting leg mechanical data from only one side

Asymmetry · Classical mechanics · Force platform · Geodesy · Ground reaction force · Impulse (physics · Kinematics · Mechanics · Physics · Simulation · Track (disk drive · Computer Science · Engineering · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Mathematics · Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training · Geology · Mechanical Engineering

  • Reference biomechanical parameters and natural asymmetry among runners across the age spectrum without a history of running-related injuries

    Open Access•Heather K Vincent, Reed Popp et al.•Frontiers in Sports and Active…•2025

  • Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

    Jacob Cohen•Statistical Power Analysis for…•2013

  • Running Velocity Does Not Influence Lower Limb Mechanical Asymmetry

    Open Access•Olivier Girard, Jean-Benoit Morin et al.•Frontiers in Sports and Active…•2019

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae