Exploring differences in stakeholders' perceptions of illegal bird trapping in Cyprus

BACKGROUND: Cyprus is recognised as a hotspot for illegal bird trapping in the Mediterranean basin. A consumer demand for the Eurasian blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla) is driving the use of non-selective trapping methods, resulting in the indiscriminate killing of millions of migratory birds. Efforts to tackle the issue have so far been characterised mostly by a top-down approach, focusing on legislation and enforcement. However, trapping levels are not decreasing and conflict between stakeholder groups is intensifying. METHODS: To understand why efforts to stop illegal bird trapping have not been effective, we used semi-structured interviews to interview 18 local bird trappers and nine representatives from the pertinent environmental non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and the governmental agencies responsible for enforcing the legislation. RESULTS: We found distinct differences between the views of the local trapping community and the environmental NGOs, particularly on why trapping is occurring and its impact on the avifauna. This disparity has contributed to misrepresentations of both sides and a high degree of conflict, which is potentially proving counterproductive to conservation interventions. In addition, it appears that trappers are a heterogeneous group, likely driven by various motivations besides profit. CONCLUSION: We argue that stakeholders interested in reducing illegal bird trapping need to develop anti-poaching strategies that aim at minimising the disparity in the views, and subsequently the conflict, acknowledging also that trappers are not a homogenous group, as often treated

Biology · Business · Enforcement · Environmental planning · Geography · Legislation · Poaching · Political science · Public relations · Stakeholder · Wildlife · Law · Species Distribution and Climate Change · Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation · Ecology

• Oiseleurs en temps d’extinction

  Open Access•Charles Stépanoff, Tiffany Chérix Dorsaz et al.•Revue d’ethnoécologie•2023

  Incluir item

• The Social and Cultural Importance of Keeping Wild Birds as Pets in an Ethnic Community in Guiyang City, China

  Open Access•Chuanyin Dai, Yu Chen et al.•Human Ecology•2021

  Incluir item

• A scoping review on what motivates individuals to illegally harvest wildlife

  Open Access•J Janssen, Andrew Lemieux et al.•Global Crime•2024

  Incluir item

• Status of Illegal Bird Hunting in Bangladesh

  Ashis Kumar Datta•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2021

  Incluir item

• Incorporating local stakeholders' voices and knowledge into conservation decisions

  Open Access•Chuanyin Dai•Journal of Ethnobiology and…•2022

  Incluir item

• Students' knowledge of and conservation attitude toward the black-necked crane (Grus nigricollis) in Guizhou, China

  Open Access•Yun Ruan, Yalong Li et al.•Journal of Ethnobiology and…•2022

  Incluir item

• Conducting Research in Conservation

  Helen Newing•Conducting Research In Conservation•2010

  Incluir item

• Presenting and Evaluating Qualitative Research

  Open Access•Claire Anderson•American Journal of Pharmaceutical…•2010

  Incluir item

• The political culture of poaching

  Open Access•Bell, Sandra Bell et al.•Biodiversity and Conservation•2007

  Incluir item

• Understanding and managing conservation conflicts

  Open Access•Steve M Redpath, Juliette Young et al.•Trends in Ecology & Evolution•2013

  Incluir item

• Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities

  Open Access•Norman Myers, Russell A Mittermeier et al.•Nature•2000

  Incluir item

• Ethnozoology

  Open Access•Romulo Romeu Da Nóbrega Alves, Wedson Medeiros Silva Souto•Ethnobiology and Conservation•2015

  Incluir item