Coach perspectives on coach-athlete relationships and characteristics of Generation Z academy level rugby union players from South Africa
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4696901 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marc Landman, Heinrich Grobbelaar (0000-0003-0616-5933), Wilbur Kraak (0000-0002-8233-2839) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Pages | 1461951-1461951 |
| Publication date | 2024-10-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Sports and Active Living (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2624-9367 • E-ISSN: 2624-9367 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fspor.2024.1461951 |
| PMID | 39498170 |
| OpenAlex | W4403617118 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 39 |
IntroductionThe coach-athlete relationship is not merely a by-product of the coaching process but serves as its foundation. Coaches today must align their approaches with the characteristics (character, strengths, and growth areas) of a new generation of athletes, commonly referred to as Generation Z (Gen Z). Born between 1995 and 2012, Gen Z's grew up in a digital age, which shaped their character and behaviour. The purpose of the study was to explore coach-athlete relationships, the characteristics of Gen Z athletes that influence this relationship, and the process of building healthy coach-athlete relationships, from the perspectives of coaches.MethodsThe study used a qualitative methodology to elicit the perspectives of 11 male rugby union coaches (M ± SD age: 42.09 ± 7.56 years; with 12.83 ± 3.48 years of coaching experience), through semi-structured individual online interviews. We developed the interview script from Jowett's Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q). The interviews were analysed using Merriam and Tisdell's six-step process.FindingsThe analysis yielded six super themes (and 17 themes). 1. Coach perspectives on coaching Gen Z players (developmental facilitators and debilitators, Covid-19's effect on development). 2. Closeness between coaches and athletes [loving and caring, getting closer, trusting, (not) respecting some players]. 3. Commitment (personally and towards the team, sacrifices). 4. Complementarity (goal setting, collectively working towards common goals). 5. Co-orientation (communicating, reciprocal relationship views). 6. Developing the coach-athlete relationship (approaches thereto, practical steps).DiscussionVarious facets of the coach-athlete relationship are interlinked and shaped by the characteristics and behaviours of this generation of athletes. Practical recommendations are offered on how to cultivate the coach-athlete relationship on emotional, cognitive, and behavioural levels
Athletes · Closeness · Coaching · Physical therapy · Medicine · Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports · Psychology · Sport Psychology and Performance · Youth Development and Social Support · Applied Psychology · Social Psychology
A pilot self-coach alignment audit in NCAA collegiate rowers
Design and evaluation of leadership development program using co-creation approaches for an athlete leadership group among elite high school rugby teams
Match or Mismatch? The Influence of Athletes’ Leadership Style Preferences on Perceived Coaching Effectiveness in Sports
Are You Ready for Gen Z in the Workplace?
An Integrative Definition of Coaching Effectiveness and Expertise
The coach–athlete relationship
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)
An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust
Facebook and texting made me do it
The Relationship between Motivation and Burnout in Athletes and the Mediating Role of Engagement
The Relationship between Coaching Behavior and Athlete Burnout
Mobile Shopping during Covid-19
Relationship interdependence and satisfaction with important outcomes in coach-athlete dyads
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |