Social Constructions of Femaleness in Writing about Cancer

Bibliographic Data

ID4720063
AuthorsBeth Hanson (0000-0002-5901-316X, York University, corresponding author), Barbara Hanson (York University in Toronto, Canada)
Year2001
Volume11
Issue4
Pages464-476
Publication date2001-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueQualitative Health Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-7323 • E-ISSN: 1552-7557
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/104973201129119253
PMID11521605
OpenAlexW2170910445
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited19

This article uses a qualitative content analysis of writing about cancer since 1900, with numeric summaries from Medline/PubMed searches, to propose that there is an implicit reliance in biomedicine on the idea that femaleness is pathological hence carcinogenic. Numeric summaries of rates of use of search terms for men and women and their sexual attributes are a backdrop for text sources that illustrate a greater tendency to see women in sexual terms and pathologize aspects of femaleness. This even extends into more frequent use of the term estrogen than testosterone in exclusively male cancer sites such as prostate and testicle. The analysis suggests that female focus and pathologization of femaleness come from social sex differentiation, heterosexual bias, and objectification of women as sex objects. This may be detrimental to both women and men because these social constructions may have focused cancer research on social classifications that are not physically relevant

Bioinformatics · Biology · Biomedicine · Epistemology · Masculinity · MEDLINE · Objectification · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Gender Studies · Obesity and Health Practices · Philosophy · Psychology · Race, Genetics, and Society · Sex and Gender in Healthcare · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub