Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Identification of stone deterioration patterns with large multimodal models. Definitions and benchmarking

Bibliographic Data

ID4725099
AuthorsDaniele Corradetti (0000-0001-8086-0593, Instituto Superior Técnico, corresponding author), José Delgado Rodrigues (0000-0002-5180-6130, Department of Cultural Heritage)
Year2025
Volume71
Pages175-183
Publication date2025-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Cultural Heritage (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1296-2074 • E-ISSN: 1778-3674
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.culher.2024.11.017
OpenAlexW4405092614
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited4

We define a dataset for benchmarking the capabilities of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) in identifying and classifying stone deterioration patterns for cultural heritage conservation. • Results show LMMs have significant potential but require further fine-tuning and architectural enhancements to reliably identify patterns. • GPT-4omni achieved the highest target pattern identification rate at 42%, but no model achieved high accuracy, indicating large room for improvement. • Inconsistencies in repeated model inferences highlight the need for reproducibility and interpretability before deploying LMMs in real-life conservation workflows. The conservation of stone-based cultural heritage sites is a critical concern for preserving cultural and historical landmarks. With the advent of Large Multimodal Models, as GPT-4omni (OpenAI), Claude 3 Opus (Anthropic) and Gemini 1.5 Pro (Google), it is becoming increasingly important to define the operational capabilities of these models. In this work, we systematically evaluate the image classification capabilities of the main foundational multimodal models to recognise and categorize anomalies and deterioration patterns of stone elements that are useful in the practice of conservation and restoration of world heritage. After defining a taxonomy of the main stone deterioration patterns and anomalies, we asked the foundational models to identify a curated selection of 354 highly representative images of stone-built heritage, offering them a careful selection of labels to choose from. The result, which varies depending on the type of pattern, allowed us to identify the strengths and weaknesses of these models in the field of heritage conservation and restoration

Benchmarking · Business · Construction engineering · Forensic engineering · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Archaeological Research and Protection · Building materials and conservation · Computer Science · Engineering

  • New AI challenges for cultural heritage protection

    Open Access•Francesco Colace, Rosario Gaeta et al.•Journal of Cultural Heritage•2025

  • Artificial intelligence-assisted visual inspection for cultural heritage

    Open Access•M Mishra, Paulo B Lourenço•Journal of Cultural Heritage•2024

  • Automated methods for image detection of cultural heritage

    Open Access•Ariele Câmara, Ana De Almeida et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2022

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae