Thing-place distinction and localizer distribution in Chinese directed motion construction
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4754552 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jingxia Lin (0000-0001-9930-7368, Nanyang Technological University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2013 |
| Volumen | 51 |
| Número | 5 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2013-01-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0024-3949 • E-ISSN: 1613-396X |
| Editorial | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/ling-2013-0031 |
| OpenAlex | W2329377644 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
A language sensitive to a thing-place distinction (e.g., cup vs. Paris) may use thing-to-place conversion devices to allow a thing to be conceptualized as a place. Mandarin Chinese behaves inconsistently in the use of the conversion device – the addition of a localizer (e.g., li ‘inside’) to a thing noun – in that the device is not required in every situation where a thing is understood as a place, cf. dao chezi-*(li) arrive car-inside and jin chezi-(li) enter car-inside. Drawing evidence from Chinese directed motion contractions, I argue that such inconsistency is closely related to the other function of localizers: specifying the search domain of a ground that a figure is located with respect to. Specifically, Chinese adheres to a Localizer Condition according to which a localizer is not required if the information conveyed in the path verb and the (thing) ground is sufficiently specific to identify the figure's final location with respect to the (thing) ground. I show that the effects of the condition are observed in other languages such as Likpe and French, despite differences in encoding spatial relations
Distribution (mathematics) · Linguistics · Mathematical analysis · Motion (physics) · Advanced Computational Techniques and Applications · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Hand Gesture Recognition Systems · Mathematics · Optics and Image Analysis · Philosophy
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,67 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |