Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Eyes of Achilleus

"Iliad" 1.200

Bibliographic Data

ID4755158
AuthorsG I C Robertson (corresponding author)
Year1999
Volume53
Issue1/2
Pages1
Publication date1999-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhoenix (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8299 • E-ISSN: 1929-4883
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1088119
OpenAlexW2312428806
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited2

THIS IS A CRITICAL MOMENT in the first book of the Iliad: Achilleus is about to be persuaded by Athene to resist the urge to kill Agamemnon after the latter has declared his intention to seize Achilleus' concubine Brisei's. The text appears above as it is printed in the OCT (Monro and Allen 1902: 8), and the translation given here represents the interpretation that has been accepted by the vast majority of commentators and translators. With very few exceptions, scholars have not seriously entertained the possibility that the eyes in line 200 may not be Athene's; but the pronoun oi could equally be read as meaning his, and the eyes may be those of Achilleus.1 I shall argue here that this interpretation deserves more attention than it has usually been given. Some older arguments will be revisited, including the relatively recent contribution of H.-W. N6renberg (1972), but I believe that the case for such a reading can be strengthened by some further points which have not previously been made. Achilleus' behaviour later in the poem, in particular at the assembly in Book 19, favours this interpretation, and the question is significant for our understanding of the character of the hero. At 1.200, the scholiasts (Erbse 1969: 65) acknowledge both possibilities; they suggest 6 08 &avzi to ydap, implying that Achilleus recognized Athene because of the appearance of her eyes, but add zTtvig & 46oav0v &vzi To6 ~ Tozo0rloo9av oi zo o ijpoo 6400ah toi , i.e., other scholars refer the flashing eyes to the hero.2 As to the first interpretation, the assumption that Achilleus needs some visible characteristic of the goddess to facilitate recognition may be thought to be justified by other divine epiphanies in the poem, such as Helen's recognition ofAphrodite's

Classical Antiquity Studies · Medicine · Ophthalmology · Optometry

  • Ancient Anger

    Susanna Braund, Glenn W Most•Ancient Anger•2009

  • The angry poet and the angry gods

    Open Access•Elaine Fantham•Ancient Anger•2004

  • Angry bees, wasps, and jurors

    Open Access•Danielle Allen•Ancient Anger•2004

  • Thumos as masculine ideal and social pathology in ancient Greek magical spells

    Open Access•Christopher A Faraone•Ancient Anger•2004

  • The Syntax and Semantics of Homeric Glowing Eyes

    Daniel Turkeltaub•The American Journal of Philology•2005

  • Homer

    Open Access•Jasper Griffin•Homer•2003

  • The best of the Achaeans

    Gregory Nagy•The best of the Achaeans•1979

Citations per year0.23
Citation span2004 - 2009 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae