Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Transparency in conservation

Rare Species, Secret Files, and Democracy

Bibliographic Data

ID4758641
AuthorsMika Oksanen (0000-0003-2426-5727, University of Turku, corresponding author), Markku Oksanen (0000-0002-4531-2361), Anne Kumpula (University of Turku)
Year2013
Volume22
Issue6
Pages975-991
Publication date2013-11-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0964-4016 • E-ISSN: 1743-8934
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09644016.2013.775726
OpenAlexW1978421882
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited19

In many areas of environmental policy, there are clashing trends and conflicting views concerning the accessibility of information and its appropriate use. Some countries restrict access to environmental information if access compromises the protection of species, but this contrasts with environmentalist claims for transparency, the right to know, and the creation of the ‘green public sphere’. Can access to (biodiversity) information ever be justifiably denied? The paradoxical trends in environmental policy can be explained in terms of the dual role of information: as much as it contributes to environmental causes, it simultaneously enables people to utilise or destroy the objects of preservation. While recognising the problematic nature of restricting transparency, epistemic asymmetries – the kind of case in which public authorities have access to such information to which the public is denied access – can sometimes be justified in terms of security

Access to information · Business · Computer security · Democracy · Information access · Internet privacy · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Public access · Right to know · Sociology · Climate Change and Geoengineering · Computer Science · Environmental Conservation and Management · Environmental Philosophy and Ethics · Law · Public Administration

  • Public access to spatial data on private-land conservation

    Open Access•Adena R Rissman, Jessica Owley et al.•Conservation Ecology•2017

  • The Aarhus convention and process cosmopolitanism

    Open Access•David Weaver•International Environmental…•2017

  • Benefits and barriers of public transparency in Rural Environmental Registry data

    Open Access•Stella Verdasca, Victor Eduardo Lima Ranieri•Ambiente & sociedade•2021

  • Man's responsibility for nature

    John Arthur Passmore•Man's responsibility for nature•1974

  • Deliberative Democracy and the Environment

    Graham Smith•Deliberative Democracy and the…•2003

  • Sustainability

    Bryan G Norton•Sustainability•2005

  • Greening Liberal Democracy

    Richard Eckersley, Robyn Eckersley•Democracy and Green Political…•2010

  • IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts

    W B Gallie•Proceedings of the Aristotelian…•1956

  • Democracy and the Environment

    William M Lafferty, James Meadowcroft•Democracy and the Environment•1996

  • Rethinking Green Politics

    John Barry•Rethinking Green Politics•1999

  • The Green State

    Richard Eckersley, Robyn Eckersley•The Green State•2004

  • Information Disclosure and Environmental Rights

    M Mason•Global Environmental Politics•2010

  • The biodiversity information clearing-house mechanism (CHM) as a global effort

    Open Access•Pasi Laihonen, Risto Kalliola et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2004

  • Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism

    Jeremy Waldron•The Philosophical Quarterly•1987

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2017 - 2021 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae