Figures of Thought in Roman Poetry

Bibliographic Data

ID4760106
AuthorsKenneth Quinn, Gordon Williams, Gordon H Williams (0000-0002-4804-1093)
Year1982
Volume36
Issue1
Pages89
Publication date1982-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhoenix (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8299 • E-ISSN: 1929-4883
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1087985
OpenAlexW2083462357
LanguageEN
Citations received30

It has long been that the language of Roman poetry was constructed under the dictates of elaborately defined rules of rhetoric, and its content determined according the system of comparable classifications called invention. This belief has persisted in spite of the difficulty of fitting the works of Catullus, Horace, Virgil, Propertius, and Tibullus into such a rigid scheme. In this book Gordon Williams demonstrates that, although Ovid and his successors did indeed assimilate their poetry the rhetorical rules devised for prose, the earlier poets employed a quite different method. Williams sees this method as falling into either a metaphorical or metonymic mode, both of which permitted the poet to say one thing and mean another. Delicate and often startling transitions of thought could be grasped-though not necessarily on first reading-by readers assumed by the poet have a special access the poet's process of This access presupposed similarities of education, social position, and sympathetic understanding. Through close analyses of many poems, Williams shows how poets in the fifty years before Horace's death exploited metaphor, metonymy, and a third device that he calls thematic anticipation evoke subtle associations of thought. In doing so he elucidates problems of Latin poems that have been generally misunderstood almost since they day they were written

Art · Literature · Poetry · Classical Antiquity Studies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub