Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Chinese Perspectives on Alliance and Alignment

Entrapment Concerns in China's Foreign Relations

Bibliographic Data

ID4762335
AuthorsLiselotte Odgaard (0000-0002-3244-4920, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume54
Issue3
Pages432-452
Publication date2023-05-27
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAsian Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-8374 • E-ISSN: 1477-1500
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03068374.2023.2230782
OpenAlexW4385424415
LanguageEN
Citations received4

The article traces concerns about entrapment in Chinese thinking about foreign relations and how these concerns have resulted in a general rejection of alliances. The People's Republic of China was born with entrapment dilemmas vis-à-vis the Soviet Union that became real when Beijing was drawn into the Korean War at a time that did not suit Beijing's strategic interests. During the post-Cold War era, China's dialogue and coordination with NATO has given its leadership greater knowledge of the alliance's strengths and weaknesses and confirmed Beijing in its scepticism towards formal alliances. Instead, China has set out to build more flexible partnerships, particularly with Russia, that allow both sides of the arrangement to avoid entrapment in each other's different geopolitical security agendas. In an era of strategic competition with the United States, Beijing's partnership with Moscow has become the cornerstone of Chinese efforts to protect its global power and influence. At the same time, China's leadership has sought to avoid new entrapments by expanding its security engagement with countries in the 'Global South'. Besides commitments to limited cooperation such as joint exercises and training, protection of Chinese overseas interests in arms sales, in countering Western strategic aims, and in establishing a strategic military presence are at the centre of such engagements. Far-reaching commitments to protect the security interests of other countries and close integration of Chinese and foreign military forces are not on the cards. Such agreements would come at the cost of flexible partnerships and Beijing's freedom of action

Alliance · Beijing · Business · China · Cornerstone · Foreign policy · General partnership · Geopolitics · International trade · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Strategic partnership · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Military and Defense Studies · Public Administration

  • India, Japan and the Indo-Pacific

    Open Access•Jojin V John•Journal of Asian Security and…•2024

  • The European Union and an “Indo-Pacific” Alignment

    Open Access•Giulio Pugliese•Asia-Pacific Review•2024

  • Special issue

    Open Access•Jessica Trisko Darden, Joshua Shifrinson•International Politics•2026

  • European security and minilateralism in the Indo-Pacific

    Liselotte Odgaard•Australian Journal Of International…•2024

Citations per year2
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae