Speaker-specificity in speech production
The contribution of source and filter
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4771453 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Vincent Hughes (0000-0002-4411-534X, University of York, corresponding author), Amanda Cardoso (0000-0001-9040-1163, University of British Columbia), Paul Foulkes (0000-0001-9481-1004, University of York), Peter French (0000-0001-7124-8896, University of York), Amelia Gully (0000-0002-8600-121X, University of York), Philip Harrison (0000-0003-3038-858X, University of York) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 97 |
| Pages | 101224 |
| Publication date | 2023-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Phonetics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0095-4470 • E-ISSN: 1095-8576 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101224 |
| OpenAlex | W4320175785 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 46 |
This study examines the extent to which speaker-specific information is encoded in different features of vocal output and the relationships between those features. A range of acoustic features, grouped as source (laryngeal voice quality measures and fundamental frequency) and filter features (formants and Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients; MFCCs), were extracted from the vocalic portion of the hesitation marker um for 90 male speakers of Standard Southern British English. Little overall correlation between the sets of features was observed, suggesting no strong interdependence between source and filter in our data. Although filter features were consistently better at discriminating between same- and different-speaker pairs compared with source features, combining source and filter has the potential of producing the lowest error rates and the strongest speaker discrimination scores. Taken together, results show that source and filter provide complementary speaker-specific information. However, the extent of the improvements in speaker discrimination performance when combining source and filter varied across speakers. We explore potential explanations for this finding and discuss the implications for source-filter theory, and for applied fields such as speaker recognition and forensic speech science
Cepstrum · Correlation · Filter (signal processing) · Formant · Speaker diarisation · Speaker recognition · Speech recognition · Vowel · Computer Science · Mathematics · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Speech Recognition and Synthesis · Voice and Speech Disorders
The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences
Three steps forward for predictability. Consideration of methodological robustness, indexical and prosodic factors, and replication in the laboratory
Speaker-specific information in voice quality parameters
Where the science ends and the law begins
Influence of vocal effort on average and variability of fundamental frequency
A case for formant analysis in forensic speaker identification
International Practices in Forensic Speaker Comparison
Dynamic features of speech and the characterization of speakers
Exploring the Discriminatory Potential of F0 Distribution Parameters in Traditional Forensic Speaker Recognition
Speaker-specific formant dynamics
The DyViS database
International practices in forensic speaker comparisons
Strength of forensic voice comparison evidence from the acoustics of filled pauses
The effect of speaker sampling in likelihood ratio based forensic voice comparison
Interaction of social and linguistic constraints on two vowel changes in northern England
Phonation types
The use of the Vocal Profile Analysis for speaker characterization
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |