Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Performing Transnational Feminist Solidarity? The Vagina Monologues and One Billion Rising

Bibliographic Data

ID4772050
AuthorsGéraldine Harris (0000-0001-8850-4884, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume71
Issue1
Pages29-48
Publication date2019-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheatre Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0192-2882 • E-ISSN: 1086-332X
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/tj.2019.0002
OpenAlexW2937231434
LanguageEN
References cited10

Established by Eve Ensler in 1998 and centered around benefit performances of her play The Vagina Monologues (1996), V-Day has been highly successful in raising awareness and funds in support of organizations and initiatives concerned with violence against women and girls worldwide. Meanwhile, feminist scholars from diverse (inter)disciplines have long argued that the representation of women in Ensler’s play is inherently reductionist and exclusive, and as V-Day’s global reach increased, this argument has often been made from the perspective of transnational feminist theory. In 2013, V-Day launched a parallel campaign, “One Billion Rising” (OBR), which might be understood as an attempt to address this criticism. Drawing on social media and based on dance-based, flash-mob performances, OBR13 attracted high numbers of participants in over 200 countries, but some activists still characterized it as embodying the “white savior complex.” Taking account of this body of criticism of V-Day, this essay considers the two campaigns together so as to question whether, rather than Chandra Talpade Mohanty’s transnational feminist ideal of “a non-colonizing feminist solidarity across borders,” both OBR and The Vagina Monologues project might be said to represent the globalization of Ensler’s particular brand of feminism as a mode of cultural imperialism. At the same time, acknowledging that Mohanty’s critique is actually aimed at Western feminist theorizing, the essay also examines the status and impact of V-Day campaigns as situated and embodied practices in ways that raise questions about the colonizing effects of applying feminist theories across borders, both national and disciplinary

Aesthetics · Argument (complex analysis · Art · Criticism · Embodied cognition · Epistemology · Feminism · Feminist theory · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Solidarity · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Law

  • Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex

    Kimberlé Crenshaw, Kimberlé W Crenshaw•Feminist Legal Theory•2018

  • Transnational Feminist Crossings

    Chandra Talpade Mohanty•Signs: Journal of Women in…•2013

  • Redoing feminism

    Hester Baer•Feminist Media Studies•2015

  • Vaginal politics

    Open Access•Susan E Bell, Susan M Reverby•Women s Studies International Forum•2005

  • Vagina Sisters, Crying Men, Soap Opera Stars and Sushi

    Open Access•Jelena Djordjevic, Jelena Ceković Djordjevic•IDS Bulletin•2006

  • Mapping the Margins

    Kimberlé Crenshaw, Kimberlé W Crenshaw•Stanford Law Review•1991

  • Transnational feminisms in question

    Open Access•Breny Mendoza•Feminist Theory•2002

  • Intersectionality as buzzword

    Open Access•K Davis•Feminist Theory•2008

  • Under Western Eyes

    Chandra Mohanty, Chandra Talpade Mohanty•Feminist Review•1988

  • Worrying about Vaginas

    Christine M Cooper•Signs: Journal of Women in…•2007

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae