The Relationship between Unit Cost and Cumulative Quantity and the Evidence for Organizational Learning-by-Doing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4775478 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter Thompson (0000-0003-4661-6233, Professor of Organization & Management, Goizueta Business School, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia., corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 203-224 |
| Publication date | 2012-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Economic Perspectives (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0895-3309 • E-ISSN: 1944-7965 |
| Publisher | American Economic Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1257/jep.26.3.203 |
| OpenAlex | W2164417779 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 40 |
The concept of a learning curve for individuals has been around since the beginning of the twentieth century. The idea that an analogous phenomenon might also apply at the level of the organization took longer to emerge, but it had begun to figure prominently in military procurement and scheduling at least a decade before Wright's (1936) classic paper providing evidence that the cost of producing an airframe declined as cumulative output increased. Wright (1936) was careful not to describe his empirical results as a learning curve. Of his three proposed three explanations for the relationships he observed between cost and cumulative quantity produced, only one is unambiguously a source of organizational learning; the others are consistent with organizational learning but also with standard static economies of scale. It quickly became apparent that the notion of organizational learning as a by-product of accumulated experience has important consequences for firm strategy. The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) built its consulting business around the concept of what it branded the experience curve, asserting that cost reductions associated with cumulative output applied to all costs, were "consistently around 20-30% each time accumulated production is doubled, [and] this decline goes on in time without limit" (Henderson 1968). Today, the negative relationship between unit production costs and cumulative output is one of the best-documented empirical regularities in economics. Nonetheless, the thesis of this paper is that the conceptual transformation of the relationship between cost and cumulative production into an organizational learning curve with profound strategic implications has not been sufficiently supported with direct empirical evidence
Business · Economics · Empirical evidence · Epistemology · Industrial organization · Learning curve · Management · Microeconomics · Organizational learning · Unit cost · Wright · Computer Science · Economic Growth and Productivity · Economic theories and models · Firm Innovation and Growth · Marketing
Empirically grounded technology forecasts and the energy transition
Negative emissions—Part 3
Abandon the idea of an “optimal economic path” for climate policy
Would You Buy a Honda Made in the United States? The Impact of Production Location on Manufacturing Quality
The impact of product subsidies on plant‐level total factor productivity in Britain , 1997–2014
The geographical dimension of productivity in Great Britain, 2011–18
Taxation under Learning by Doing
Toward an Understanding of Learning by Doing
Can Stimulating Demand Drive Costs Down? World War II as a Natural Experiment
Making a Miracle
The Growth and Failure of U. S. Manufacturing Plants
Understanding Productivity
Factors Affecting the Cost of Airplanes
Learning Curves in Manufacturing
The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry
The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing
Learning and World War II Production Functions
The Impact of Vintage and Survival on Productivity
Would You Buy a Honda Made in the United States? The Impact of Production Location on Manufacturing Quality
Manufacturing Progress Functions
Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification
Learning-by-Doing Spillovers in the Semiconductor Industry
Invention and Bounded Learning by Doing
How Much Did the Liberty Shipbuilders Learn? New Evidence for an Old Case Study
Organization Capital
Job Matching and the Theory of Turnover
Technology and Learning by Factory Workers
The “Horndal effect” in lowell, 1834–1856
Learning and Forgetting
Learning as accumulation
| Citations per year | 0.69 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2013 - 2023 (11) |
| Highly cited | No |