Intuitions of Fittingness

In one sense of the term current among analytical philosophers, the quietist_lacks skeptical doubts about the metaphysical or epistemological status of ethical judgments as a class of judgment. He may still have doubts about, say, the current state of morality. There are criteria of courage by which, though they are open-ended, a man may count as acting bravely. It need not follow that he has adopted the best tactics. Yet he must have responded fittingly to danger. But how is that to be identified? "Ought"-judgments are to be understood contextually, with an implicit relativity to certain ends or quasi-ends, and-when the "ought" is only pro tanto-to certain aspects of, or opportunities within, a situation. These judgments are often intuitive in that they do not derive from the application of a principle. Fittingness is an anthropocentric relation that holds within some human perspective; we should not think of it as a feature purportedly inherent in the very nature of things. It is salutary to remember cases where the "ought" is so relativized, say to an undesirable end, that it identifies no reason for action. The nature of the relation does not change when it is relativized to an end that the agent has reason to achieve. "Ought"-judgments should not be interpreted in ambitious ways that make them generally problematic

Anthropocentrism · Courage · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Metaphysics · Morality · Philosophy of mind · Skepticism · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Psychology

• Ethics

  J L Mackie•Ethics•1977

  Add to list

• Groundwork of The Metaphysic of Morals

  Immanuel Kant•Immanuel Kant•2020

  Add to list

• Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy

  Bernard Williams, Adrian Moore•Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy•2006

  Add to list

• Action, Emotion and Will

  Anthony Kenny•Action, Emotion and Will•2003

  Add to list