Memorializing Miscarriages of Justice
Clemency Petitions in the Killing State
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4775941 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Austin Sarat (University of Alabama, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 183-224 |
| Publication date | 2008-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Law & Society Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0023-9216 • E-ISSN: 1540-5893 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2008.00338.x |
| OpenAlex | W2033901438 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 27 |
Clemency in capital cases today has become quite rare. Capital clemency has been a victim of the rejection of rehabilitation as the guiding philosophy of criminal sentencing and of the increasing politicization of issues of crime and punishment since the 1960s. Yet despite the reluctance of governors to grant clemency, despite the difficulty of rectifying miscarriages of justice through the clemency process, petitions seeking commutation or pardon in death cases still are regularly presented to chief executives. With so little chance of success, filing them may seem to be nothing more than an empty ritual. In this article, I examine clemency petitions from Texas and Virginia, and I argue that those petitions may serve another function, and take on meaning in another way. This function I label "memorialization." These pleas provide an archive of stories of law's failures, of alleged breakdowns in the legal process, of a legal process in disrepair, as well as of racial prejudice, of lives shattered by violence and neglect, of remorse, rehabilitation, and redemption. They are cultural artifacts, documents that address both governors and an indeterminate audience beyond them and that memorialize miscarriages of justice. While they reveal the importance of religion, family, and good works in American thinking about remorse, redemption, and mercy, they also should be seen as histories of the present, documenting the breakdowns and inequities in the death penalty system as well as the tragic circumstances of lives shaped and shattered by poverty, abuse, and neglect
Abandonment (legal · Capital (architecture · Criminology · Economic Justice · Human rights · Legal process · Meaning (existential · Neglect · Nothing · Political science · Prejudice (legal term · Punishment (psychology · Remorse · Restorative justice · Sociology · Torture · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · History · Law · Psychology · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
A Comparison of Executions and Death to Life Commutations in Kentucky, 1901–2019
Penality in the Underground
Consistency and Compensation in Mercy
Empirical Legal Scholarship in Law Reviews
Underground penality
Mercy and the Construction of Social Control
Making sense of the victim’s role in clemency decision making
Victim–perpetrator Reconciliation Agreements
Dynamic rare decisions
Commentaries on the Laws of England, Volume 1
The Supreme Court, 1982 Term
Voluntary Control of Smooth Eye Movements and their Velocity
Albion's fatal tree
Interpreting Rights
The Death Penalty
Governing Through Crime
Introduction To 'Beyond Criticism
Justice Denied
Miscarriages of Justice in Potentially Capital Cases
Violence and the Word
Between Memory and History
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,56 |
| Citation span | 2010 - 2023 (14) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |