The Death of Oedipus in the Epic Tradition
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4777795 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ettore Cingano (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1992 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1 |
| Publication date | 1992-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Phoenix (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8299 • E-ISSN: 1929-4883 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1088770 |
| OpenAlex | W2041561609 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
NOTWITHSTANDING THE DISCOVERY, fifteen years ago, of a substantial papyrus fragment of Stesichorus describing the division of the estate of Oedipus (PLille 76 + 73 + 111), the material evidence for reconstructing the early versions of the myth of Oedipus remains scanty. Only a few epic fragments have survived, together with brief references in Homer, Hesiod, Pindar, and other lyric poets, and in the mythographers who in some cases were themselves reporting earlier traditions. A remarkable parade of conjectures and suggestions has therefore attempted to reconcile the very many discrepancies amongst the various versions, in order to provide an outline establishing a plausible and continuous narrative sequence for the myth. My analysis will deal with the death of Oedipus, a theme of considerable importance also for reconstructing the historical and mythological background of the wars between Thebes and Orchomenus. I will attempt to demonstrate that the account of the most ancient sources has often been misinterpreted in recent times
Art · EPIC · Literature · Ancient Egypt and Archaeology · Classical Antiquity Studies · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,08 |
| Citation span | 2000 - 2018 (19) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |