The Law and Economics of the Economic Expert Witness

Bibliographic Data

ID4778347
AuthorsRichard A Posner (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Chicago, Illinois; University of Chicago Law School, Chicago, Illinois., corresponding author)
Year1999
Volume13
Issue2
Pages91-100
Publication date1999-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Economic Perspectives (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0895-3309 • E-ISSN: 1944-7965
PublisherAmerican Economic Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1257/jep.13.2.91
OpenAlexW2064602730
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited7

I will consider the law and economics of the use of economic expert witnesses. After introducing the law governing the use of expert witnesses (including economists), I analyze and respond to several concerns regarding the use of expert witnesses. The first is that expert witnesses paid by the respective parties are bound to be partisans ("hired guns") rather than being disinterested, and hence presumptively truthful, or at least honest, witnesses. A second concern is about intelligibility once the expert's evidence has been admitted. A third concern about expert testimony is that opposing experts often cancel each other out. Supposing that the use of economists' testifying as expert witnesses is here to stay, we should consider how the system might be improved. My major proposal is the greater use of court-appointed experts selected on the arbitration model, but I have two additional proposals

Economics · Expert witness · Law and economics · Neoclassical economics · Political science · Witness · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal principles and applications

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access