Negotiating vulnerability through "animal" and "child
Agamben and Rancière at the Limit of Being Human
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4783538 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joanne Faulkner (0000-0001-5694-181X, UNSW Sydney, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 73-85 |
| Publication date | 2011-12-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Angelaki (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0969-725X • E-ISSN: 1469-2899 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0969725x.2011.641346 |
| OpenAlex | W1600834621 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 9 |
While ethics and justice are domains that concern the human, this paper argues that these spheres are organized and given meaning in terms of what lies at the limits of the human subject: children (excluded from political and economic life) and non-human animals. In this respect, the orientation to ethical life takes the form of a disavowal: in the attempt to negotiate human vulnerability, a subjectivity that defines itself in terms of the control of nature displaces its fragility onto children and animals. In the face of environmental catastrophe – and the threats to human security that accompany it – there is a shared sense of the tenuousness of life. An opportunity to comprehend this tenuousness is missed, however, to the extent that both children and animals are romanticized as "innocent": ethically pure because morally and politically incapable. Because of their exclusion from the sphere of moral action, children and non-human animals have come to represent human vulnerability in general: a vulnerability associated with passivity, and a lack of precisely the control that has produced the problems we now face. This paper argues for a reconsideration of the passivity and vulnerability that lies at the "limits of being human" as the site of ethical and political change. The philosophy of Giorgio Agamben is deployed to think through the caesura between human and non-human animality, and the "passivity" or impotentiality that enables the ethical. Jacques Rancière is also drawn upon to consider the failure to recognize children and animals as political actors
Action (physics · Economic Justice · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Face (sociological concept · Human enhancement · Meaning (existential · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Subject (documents · Subjectivity · Vulnerability (computing · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Political Theology and Sovereignty
Reflecting (on) Nature
Unconventional Carers
First as waste, then as feral
“Making the unimaginable imaginable?” The power of artmaking in understanding animal vulnerabilities and “humanimal” relationality in Organization Studies
The child as mediator of racial ambivalence in Australia
Turning the World Upside Down
The Children Who Have No Part
Childhood, Biosocial Power and the “Anthropological Machine”
From Aetotemporal Becomings to Petophilic Hospitality
Ghosts of eugenics’ past
Environmental Education and Children's Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene
I EAT THEREFORE I AMan essay on human and animal mutuality
Warming the house
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2013 - 2025 (13) |
| Highly cited | No |