Lyotard's Differend
Radical and Unresolved Dispute, from the Political to the Literary
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4784057 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anne Tomiche (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 28-42 |
| Publication date | 2017-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Paragraph (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0264-8334 • E-ISSN: 1750-0176 |
| Publisher | Edinburgh University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3366/para.2017.0213 |
| OpenAlex | W2589257707 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
Lyotard's notion of the differend can be analysed as a philosophical theory of radical disputes, that is, disputes with no possible resolution other than the silencing of one of the parties. The concept is explicitly meant to shed light on ethical, historical and political debates, while literature and psychoanalysis are strikingly absent from this theory. However, the concept of the differend is crucial to Lyotard's own discussions of literature and art. Developing from a reading of some of his texts on literature and art and on psychoanalysis, this essay shows how the concept of the differend operates in Lyotard's understanding and appreciation of literature and art, in order to then ask how the differend can help us think issues of 'modernity', 'modernism' and 'postmodernism' in terms other than those of literary history, and can help us think experimental writings and artistic practices of the twentieth century in terms other than those of provocation or scandal
Aesthetics · Art · Epistemology · Linguistics · Literary criticism · Literary theory · Literature · Modernity · Politics · Postmodernism · Sociology · Anthropology · Contemporary Literature and Criticism · Cultural Studies · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Postmodernism in Literature and Education
| Highly cited | No |
|---|