Case note. Kennewick man and native American graves protection and repatriation act woes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4784375 |
|---|---|
| Authors | L J Zimmerman, Lj Zimmerman (University of Iowa), Rn Clinton (University of Iowa) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 212-228 |
| Publication date | 1999-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Cultural Property (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0940-7391 • E-ISSN: 1465-7317 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0940739199770670 |
| OpenAlex | W2113533611 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
The contentious, sometimes even raucous debate over the repatriation and reburial of Native American human remains has been calm compared to the clamor raised over the so-called Kennewick Man. Although the reburial debate has captured substantial worldwide media and public attention, the debate over the Kennewick find has done what no other case has so far managed - to raise a serious legal challenge to parts of the 1990 Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), a law providing for the return of human remains and burial artifacts to tribes. This case study examines the core issues surrounding the archaeological discovery, the entanglements related to NAGPRA, and possible impact of Kennewick on NAGPRA itself
Ethnology · Native american · Political science · Repatriation · Archaeological Research and Protection · Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies · History · Law
Challenging the Carceral Imaginary in a Digital Age
Ethnicity and Related Forms of Race
NAGPRA at 30
Re)Engaging with the (Un)Known
Public Heritage, a Desire for a "White" History for America, and Some Impacts of the Kennewick Man/ Ancient One Decision
Leaving Few Bones Unturned
Acts of estrangement. The post-mortem making of self and other
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2005 - 2021 (17) |
| Highly cited | No |