Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is your resurrection too small

Bibliographic Data

ID4789285
AuthorsCraig Hovey (0009-0009-5807-492X, Ohio, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume113
Issue873
Pages192-199
Publication date2010-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0040-571X • E-ISSN: 2044-2696
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0040571x1011300305
OpenAlexW2221534782
LanguageEN

This article asks about the kind of knowledge appropriate to Christ's resurrection and attempts to preserve its mystery against modern habits of knowing. Such habits inscribe a distance from the resurrection as event, tempting theology to enlist the resurrection in a larger set of arguments and proofs of something else like the reliability of Scripture's witness. As such, they diminish more generally all witness to contingent history. In contrast, this article finds a resource in Thomas Aquinas' claim that the resurrection is 'fitting', a judgement that Christians can only claim after the fact and perform in the work of worship and liturgy

Epistemology · Event (particle physics) · Judgement · Liturgy · Mathematical proof · Set (abstract data type) · Theology · Witness · Worship · Computer Science · Karl Barth and Christian Theology · Mathematics · Medieval Philosophy and Theology · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae