Conscientious Objection by Health Care Professionals
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4793258 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gry Wester (0000-0003-3786-0023, University of Bergen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 427-437 |
| Publication date | 2015-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy Compass (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/phc3.12235 |
| OpenAlex | W2112853187 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 26 |
Certain health care services and goods, although legal and often generally accepted in a society, are by some considered morally problematic. Debates on conscientious objection in health care try to resolve whether and when physicians, nurses and pharmacists should be allowed to refuse to provide medical services and goods because of their ethical or religious beliefs. These debates have most often focused on issues such as how to balance the interests of patients and health care professionals, and the compatibility of conscientious objection with professional obligations, but it is also possible to think about conscientious objection in terms of how to respond to moral disagreement and the requirements of liberal neutrality
Conscientious objector · Health care · Health professionals · Neutrality · Political science · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Torture, Ethics, and Law
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2025 (9) |
| Highly cited | No |