Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Getting Back to Normal

On Normativity in History and Historiography

Bibliographic Data

ID4797252
AuthorsD Woolf (0000-0001-9537-1936, Queen's University, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume60
Issue3
Pages469-512
Publication date2021-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistory and Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-2656 • E-ISSN: 1468-2303
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hith.12225
OpenAlexW3198124109
LanguageEN
Citations received2

Normativity has long been a central concept in ethics, medicine, and the social sciences. It has not been fully explored as an element in historiography or historical thought. This article contends that normativity, when taken as a metaconcept that underpins notions of the "normal," "norms," and "normality," can help us understand changing attitudes to the possibility, actuality, and moral exemplarity of historical phenomena, but only if we disaggregate three different modes or registers of normativity: moral, metaphysical, and phenomenal. After exploring the place of moral normativity in historical thought and writing from antiquity to the early modern era, I discuss metaphysical and phenomenal normativity as filters that, from the Middle Ages through the seventeenth century, were applied to reported or recorded experience prior to any decision to derive from it any moral conclusions. I then argue that Baconian empiricism, Humean skepticism, classical probability theory, and mathematical statistics collectively gave rise to a modern sense of what constituted "normality" for past and present events. Finally, I conclude that the late Enlightenment bequeathed to modernity and postmodernity a normalized sense of fundamental rupture (exemplified by the French Revolution and characterized as the "historical sublime") that we still experience and struggle through as we routinely reconstruct history as both a linear tradition and a discontinuous series of "new normals." We also contend with this sense of fundamental rupture as we "renormalize" catastrophes that could reasonably be regarded as beyond normalization while simultaneously fetishizing the experience of disruption, which we have defined as a clinamenic swerve from one normality into another. This paradoxical process is accompanied by a deadened capacity to judge that which is, and is not, normal

Empiricism · Enlightenment · Epistemology · Historiography · Metaphysics · Modernity · Normality · Skepticism · Transcendental number · History · Philosophy · Probability and Statistical Research

  • Whose normal is the new normal anyway? A critical leadership appraisal of university administrators in a waning pandemic

    Open Access•Bert Spector•Qualitative Research in…•2023

  • Conceptualizing the History of the Present Time

    Open Access•María Inés Mudrovcic•Conceptualizing the History of…•2024

Citations per year0.67
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae